Result!

[ban-all-sheds]

Quite right too,,,, brilliant!!!

No, neither.

And it remains to be seen if it will happen.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

So the UK yet again breaks international law

That remains to be seen.

AIUI it will hinge on whether someone who is entitled to citizenship elsewhere but hasn't obtained it would be stateless if the only one they did have was withdrawn.

But then the red-mist haters here don't believe in the rule of law, they don't think that the UK should be a law-abiding country (presumably because they aren't law-abiding in the things which they do), so we can look forward to years of them venting their opposition to legality.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

If she qualified for citizenship of another country, she can have her UK citizenship removed. It would appear that this is the case. No treaty broken, no lawyers harmed.

That remains to be seen.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

* Lord Carlisle (giant legal brain) says that if Mum is Bangladeshi, then her offspring are bangladeshi also.

Lord Carlisle (sic) has also pointed out that as her citizenship had not been withdrawn when she gave birth, her child is British.

 

[EFLImpudence]

It does seem very odd.

Could, for instance, Australia deprive some tosspot, who was born there, of citizenship because his father was British?

 

[ban-all-sheds]

This seems a very odd 'rule' - just 'qualified for' not has?

AIUI that is the matter which will be tested in court.

Why would Bangladesh (or any other country) want her?

Syria might want her to put on trial for any offences she committed there.

Bangladesh may have no choice but to grant her citizenship.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

It does seem very odd.

Could, for instance, Australia deprive some tosspot, who was born there, of citizenship because his father was British?

Would the tosspot also be British?

 

[ban-all-sheds]

there was a bloke who murdered a 31 year old woman who rented a room in the same house she was a Canadian he cut her body up and dumped it in a pond

What's the relevance of that?

 

[ban-all-sheds]

A bit of a knee jerk reaction due to media coverage but a great result for the Law Profession as they battle out the case using Tax Payers money for the next couple of years

I can fully understand why Javid did what he did, but I fear he may have jumped the gun.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Would the tosspot also be British?

Surely as much as the girl is Bangladeshi.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

She is now stateless due to the UK action...

Great

And DP hammers another nail into the coffin of British trustworthiness.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

Surely as much as the girl is Bangladeshi.

Dunno - I'm not that familiar with the law on citizenship.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

Would the home office have made such a mistake?

Making mistakes on nationality issues is one of their core values.

 

[sodthisforfun]

It does seem very odd.

Could, for instance, Australia deprive some tosspot, who was born there, of citizenship because his father was British?

If it's written into the law in Australia...?

Edited: https://www.theguardian.com/austral...ttacked-by-australian-human-rights-commission

https://www.theguardian.com/austral...move-to-strip-australian-citizenship-in-doubt

 

[sodthisforfun]

Making mistakes on nationality issues is one of their core values.

Such as....?