I don't recollect China cutting steel production which is what he wanted them to do.
Rishi or Liz?
- Thread starter Mottie
- Start date
Sponsored Links
You don't seem to recollect my earlier question, either.
Then how would you rather govern the affairs of state; some random bloke stand on a rock to distribute law and justice?
The Queen just goes through the motion's really She could do the same with a president. Exactly the same actually.
Why the hell people say she would have to go defeats me. Pure baloney. Our set up is too old and dated.
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 22 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 5,411
- Reaction score
- 608
- Country
Take your pick.
So, a set-up similar to the French system?
D
Deleted member 18243
Correct, the "tories" have continued all of Blair's policies since he finished, glad you have finally realised this.Tories dont lead they just follow
here we are Tories taking on a Labour policy:
No, but the solution lies not with ANY of our current politicians, of any party.
Poor old sod. Get over him.
Why pick the French? They are not the only country to use a presidential system.
Did they? I thought the trade balance wasn't much changed. Apparently it got worse.
America’s trade gap soared under Trump, final figures show
As Trump tamped down on imports from China, U.S. companies turned to other foreign suppliers.
www.politico.com
He may have reduced china's steel exports a bit. He wanted them to cut back production so that supply and demand would increase prices. That is the view given anyway but I'd say highly unlikely to be accepted.
No, but 'twas the first example to mind. A tripartite system, in any case, unless you're aiming for a bipartisan solution. The Romans introduced both with limited success, and our society has become much too complex for a confederacy. Federalism has become entwined with Globalism so where are we headed in the 21st century for government to solve these issues?
The USA has 2 parties. We have more that get to be MP's so can't see the reason for your comment.
In a presidential system a party needs to be able to provide a president. I suppose that at the MP level things could finish up that the presidential iideas could be blocked however the same could happen in our system due to groups joining. With the greens gaining momentum this sort of thing may happen here There is no perfect solution so my comment is a bit tongue in cheek. I feel our system needs a throrough shaking up. It has too much history behind it and that has an effect on behaviour.
I disagree: our history makes the UK what it is. It binds us, monarchy and people, in a Commonwealth. It is often forgot and requires constant updates to maintain its relevance in the modern world. Advocate dissolution at your peril.
Our system effectively is anyway. Business is the ruling factor on globalism. They are the ones that "do it".
This interests me as well. A similar system we force on the assemblies that parliament don't want.
How does proportional representation work in Germany?
Elections to Germany’s Bundestag – Germany’s House of Commons – are held under Mixed Member Proportional Representation (MMP).This electoral system seeks to combine features of
www.electoral-reform.org.uk
They want straight past the post which forces their direct political views on us. Coalitions have to come to some agreement. There is .more need for them to work together. Our coalition resulted in company cars for a more minor party and maybe one or two of their ideas being agreed. If this happened all of the time I don't think it could continue in this fashion. LOL Just like any system though it can go wrong.
The UK - in some ways it is and isn't a socialist state. Sort of tug of war where Cameron says charities can catch the people who fall below the net.
I wondered if he would bring back the poor houses. The gig ecconomy is a bit like earlier days - knock on the door on Monday and ask if there is any work to do this week. Taxation is used to support some in work to allow them to live.Sponsored Links
