??? Of course it's unnatural. If the human race all turner gay tomorrow we'd be extinct within 70 years. A gay marriage/relationship, just has to be a sterile relationship (think about that before you answer, ,,, and please don't say the human race could use technological/ scientific advances,,, because they just ain't natural. )
I have nothing against gays/homosexuals, but I do have a problem with those who go against nature (see above ,, re sterile relationships for the reason)
Why should people be discriminated against for something which people have no choice?
Not at all. ..... I do however have a problem with those who strive to ram , homosexuality down our throats (in the media ,,,, metaphorically speaking)You don't have a problem with gays
I don't care what they do to each other. I just think it's unnatural, that's all.
And where have I said they should be discriminated against? Call me a traditionalist, or even a dinosaur, but my opinion is that the definition of 'marriage' should not be changed simply to make a minority feel happier. It isn't necessary. Should we also change the definition of a man, or that of a woman?