S
sodthisforfun
Irrelevant.
Shabina Begum can come back to UK
- Thread starter Notch7
- Start date
- Status
S
sodthisforfun
"Under international law, it is only legal to revoke someone's citizenship if an individual is entitled to citizenship of another country."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53427197
So I guess they are arguing that she is of Bangladeshi descent, mothers side and entitled.
Being treated the same way ISIS treated others, only they murdered.
Just to check, it that the genuine text of the Convention that UK signed?
if so, then it obviously overrides any opinion or interpretation found elsewhere.
I don't agree that the UK state should model its behaviour on the behaviour of ISIS.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,165
- Reaction score
- 5,531
- Country
Start with section 40 of the British Nationality Act 1981 - http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/61/section/40
as amended by Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
Forget International treaties etc. They all have to get ratified in law google "how do international treated get incorporated in UK law" you will find several articles explaining how it all happens, the role parliament has, what happens if the treaty is not made law and a whole bunch of things necessary to avoid making sh*te up.
Opinion - yes, UK law... not so much.... well not at all, mostly.
Last edited:
She clearly hates everything about the U.K. except for it's generous benefits, free housing and health care. She wouldn’t think twice about chopping the head off any of us on this forum including the luvvies that will stand up for her rights. She’s an evil bitch. I was brought up never to hurt a woman but if I saw her in the street, I’d kick her right in the ****.
Yet according to Ryler (I think it was) if Ellal said something unacceptable to you face to face your threat only meant you would laugh at him.
Well, that's that one busted.
.
Last edited:
Ellals just a regular U.K. hater who hides behind a cloak of anonymity. Probably wouldn’t say boo to a goose. He’s not likely to chop anyones head off for 'the cause' and he only threatened to leave the U.K. because of his hatred for it whereas she actually did.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
If the UK signs up to a UN Convention, one assumes that UK law would respect that Convention.
The Convention gives time for the Convention to come into effect in the signatory countries.
I think UK has had sufficient time now, since '54 or '61. Don't you?
It's a UN Convention, which UK signed up to.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
But the UK cannot argue that Bangladesh must grant her citizenship. It can only argue that she may be entitled to it.
But Bangladesh are not signatories to the Convention, so are not bound by it.
Bangladesh have grounds to refuse Shamima citizenship because she has never resided in that country, and because she has not always been stateless.
Finally, that rescinding of citizenship, and rendering stateless, depends on the individual having received a formal assertion that they will be granted citizenship of another country. Shamima has not received that assertion, as far as we know.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
S
sodthisforfun
No, neither do I. Luckily we stopped killing people a while back, so really, luckily, we're nothing like Isis.
- Status
