oops seems I gave her a new name!Shamima Begum..
Allowed back in order to fight the decision of stripping her of citizenship. Nothing yet of Isis crimes.
No problems, Notch7, We all make mistakes, although some of us claim not to.oops seems I gave her a new name!
I wonder is Bobby will be commenting.....
The court has simply recognised that under international law, which the UK has signed up to, it is illegal to make a person stateless.
This will now have to be proved to be the case or not, although I see the government are to appeal.
To the supreme court and if needs be to the ECJ - how ironic is that!
If charges are to be brought, then they should be heard in a UK court.
But the crimes were not committed in the UK as far as I know.. so why should they be done here?If charges are to be brought, then they should be heard in a UK court.
She didn't, at the time, have citizenship of any other country. The UK argued she could apply for citizenship of another country. So she was, in effect, made stateless.But the crimes were not committed in the UK as far as I know.. so why should they be done here?
She can have citizenship overseas on her mothers side. Was she made stateless? Or was it just that Bangladesh didn't want her either?
She can, but in the meantime, she was made stateless. That is against international law.She can apply for Bangladeshi citizenship.
So is being a member of a terrorist group.She can, but in the meantime, she was made stateless. That is against international law.
If a person breaks the law, they can be arrested, charged and if found guilty, penalised. If their crime was against international law, they could be arrested and charged in any country.So is being a member of a terrorist group.
Ah, people, if only they took these things into account...
She didn't, at the time, have citizenship of any other country. The UK argued she could apply for citizenship of another country. So she was, in effect, made stateless.
The UK had no guarantee that she would be successful in her application for another country.
If a person breaks the law, they can be arrested, charged and if found guilty, penalised. If their crime was against international law, they could be arrested and charged in any country.
What happens when a nation breaks international law? What is the rule of law worth under that scenario?