- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 13,542
- Reaction score
- 7,818
- Country

Think you have sort of made my point clear1 it's not hate. It's just fact, the man isn't fit to be potus.
2. It's not lefties, it's anybody that isn't far right and blind

Think you have sort of made my point clear1 it's not hate. It's just fact, the man isn't fit to be potus.
2. It's not lefties, it's anybody that isn't far right and blind

Ok, let's go back.Neither am I , it is your questioning jumping all over the place

Depends what context?
If they announced it in a speech in front of a lot of angry people baying for blood, because they had been told for weeks that their elected leader has had the election stolen from him and that those alleged thieves were all in a building down the road and that they should march on that building and fight like hell - then yes.

Are you saying he never incited violence too ?The BBC is announcing it to a load of angry people baying for blood: communists, muslims, BLMists, immigrant welcomers etc

Did the BBC make false claims and edited his speech to make it sound more spicey? Yes or no is sufficient to answer this question.Ok, let's go back.
Are you saying he never incited violence ?
Everything after that was you jumping around to avoid saying.

We've already done this subject to death. What thrill do you get from asking the same questions over and over?Are you saying he never incited violence too ?
Are you saying he never incited violence too ?

You get a thrill from repeating the same nonsense over and over.We've already done this subject to death. What thrill do you get from asking the same questions over and over?

That wasn't the question though was it.Not in the speech being referred to, no. Feel free to show us where he did.

I will let your non answer speak for itself.Did the BBC make false claims and edited his speech to make it sound more spicey? Yes or no is sufficient to answer this question.

I am confused, did you answer the question?I will let your non answer speak for itself.
Swerve serve and swerved again, well done

I know, it showsI am confused,
When you answer the earlier 1, then I will.did you answer the question?
That wasn't the question though was it.
Are you saying he never incited violence too ?
Not in the speech being referred to, no. Feel free to show us where he did.
But a tacit acceptance from you that he did.

As I said, the BBC edited his speech to look like he had incited violence, I cannot really say anymore than that, why do you think Trump is going to sue them?I know, it shows
When you answer the earlier 1, then I will.
But I don't expect I will have to

You ga thrill from rting the same se over d owanted an hone direswer