Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are

[Koolpc]

I have said this before and i will say it again, WOOF!

 

[noseall]

As well as inciting the riot, having already whipped the morons into a frenzy with weeks of stolen election nonsense, he cheerily supported the hanging of his VP and stood smirking whilst house Reps cowered for their lives, Capitol
Police died and people shot.

If it wasn’t for Presidential immunity the traitorous fat orange rapist would swing.

Misleading my arse.

 

[morqthana]

Its because people are sick of the lefty woke trolls on here...

Yes 100%. They just don't see the fact that it is a very small group on here that don't like it. You would think they would simply move on elsewhere.

I agree. It is a very small group on here that don't like left wing views to be posted, but they just don't see that fact. And yes, as you say, you would think that "people [who] are sick of the lefty woke trolls on here" would simply move on.

 

[Koolpc]

The left woke trolls on here are in the minority though...

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Are you saying they were wrong to say that their edit "gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action."?

Conflating things again?

Do try harder

2 different actions, already explained.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Because its not enough. How does someone resigning help restore the lies/libel against Trump?

2 different issues in play.

You need to differentiate them and treat them accordingly.

 

[Highway Man]

2 different issues in play.

You need to differentiate them and treat them accordingly.

So they both just resigned for a laugh.

 

[morqthana]

Where do you get your information from?

It isn't the BBC

I quite like GB news tbh

I do like Trumps way of getting things done, nothing wrong with GB news

 

[morqthana]

It good to see the forum numpties think that someone with a poor reputation cannot suffer defamation. Of course it’s nonsense.

No, it isn't nonsense.

A claimant needs to show that the statement complained of:

• is defamatory, meaning that an ordinary person would think worse of the claimant as a result of the statement;
• identifies or refers to them, and
• is published to a third party.

As defamation is a tort of strict liability, there is no need for the claimant to establish that the defendant had an intention to defame.

Since the introduction of the 2013 Defamation Act, (DA 2013), which came into force on 1 January 2014, claimants must now also demonstrate that the publication of the statement caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. In the case of bodies trading for profit, the serious harm to its reputation needs to have caused, or be likely to cause, serious financial loss.

 

[morqthana]

The overall context was that it "gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action."

So now you're keen on "overall context".

OK.

 

[motorbiking]

Conflating things again?

Do try harder

2 different actions, already explained.

2 different issues in play.

You need to differentiate them and treat them accordingly.

You just need to stop spinning around trying to pretend that they didn't do what they did and have apologised for.

 

[morqthana]

The left woke trolls on here are in the minority though...

Define "woke".

And provide proof, or at the very least an intelligent, rational, credible argument, showing that the people who post left-wing views here don't genuinely believe them, but are simply and cynically posting them in order to start arguments and sow discord.

You can do that, can't you? I mean, it's not that you just throw out accusations of trolling against people precisely because you have no intelligent, rational, credible arguments to use against the things they write?

 

[morqthana]

Whichever way you look at it the bbc's reputation has taken a massive nosedive. It cannot be trusted now. Who will seriously trust it? How can anyone take what it says without 'verifying' it?

OK. Let's "verify" the BBC.

BBC - Bias and Credibility

LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or

mediabiasfactcheck.com

And while we're at it, in the interests of balance, we should "verify" other news media, no?

GB News UK - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Daily Telegraph (UK) - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may

mediabiasfactcheck.com

The Times UK and The Sunday Times - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words

mediabiasfactcheck.com

The Sun UK - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Daily Express - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Daily Mail - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

 

[morqthana]

How can the BBC possibly deny this undeniable proof of left-wing bias?

This week, yet another Reform representative appeared on Question Time, making him the fifth Reform voice to appear on Question Time in nine weeks.

Reform have 5 MPs, but the Green Party who have 4 have only had one representative on the programme in the same time period.

Clear left-wing bias.

Left-wing BBC bias again as 5th Reform mouthpiece appears on Question Time in 9 weeks

The BBC's left-wing bias was on display again after yet another Reform mouthpiece appeared on Question Time.

www.thelondoneconomic.com

 

[carmanmemoranda]

So they both just resigned for a laugh.

If that's what you think, fair enough