Some would be thrilled to hear that

Status
Not open for further replies.
Any other examples of the convicted that it would be more “civilised” to serve their punishment at home?
 
Sponsored Links
No surprise tbh

most if not all French presidents have allegations of corruption made against them

bribery
Back handers
Un declared gifts

par for the course in France ;)

scoundrels
 
No surprise tbh

most if not all French presidents have allegations of corruption made against them

bribery
Back handers
Un declared gifts

par for the course in France ;)

scoundrels
The one's that didn't have allegations made against them were sneaky enough to not get caught.
You've always said they were scoundrels tranny, you've been proved right.(y)
 
You've always said they were scoundrels tranny, you've been proved right.(y)
Have right wing politicians the word over, ever been anything but cheating nest feathering lying bastads?

No carrot for tranny, not even close.
 
Sponsored Links
Have right wing politicians the word over, ever been anything but cheating nest feathering lying bastads?

No carrot for tranny, not even close.

Well yes the French presidents fit yer description
 
Any other examples of the convicted that it would be more “civilised” to serve their punishment at home?
If they are no threat to society, if they are unlikely to re-offend, and the loss of reputation, etc is the biggest punishment, and they are imprisoned, then prison is more about revenge than punishment, and it is likely to radicalise the offender, mixing with those other career and violent criminals.
In such instances of Sarkozy (i.e. unlikely to reoffend and no threat to society, etc ), it is more humane, more economical, more sensible to punish them in a civilised manner. They are, in effect, being subjected to the 'stocks' and public humiliation without the violence.
 
If they are no threat to society, if they are unlikely to re-offend, and the loss of reputation, etc is the biggest punishment, and they are imprisoned, then prison is more about revenge than punishment, and it is likely to radicalise the offender, mixing with those other career and violent criminals.
In such instances of Sarkozy (i.e. unlikely to reoffend and no threat to society, etc ), it is more humane, more economical, more sensible to punish them in a civilised manner. They are, in effect, being subjected to the 'stocks' and public humiliation without the violence.

What do you think would happen to Joe public if they had been convicted of the same offenses?
 
which uk pm has been jailed ?
More appropriately, which UK politicians have been jailed?


AND which UK politicians/PMs have been suspected of acting illegally but not been properly investigated? Or even, when found guilty of acting illegally, or against current restrictions, (or suspected but never charged) have escaped any punishment entirely?

Furthermore, how many UK politicians have been appointed to cabinet positions or nominated for peerages after being convicted of crimes?
 
Last edited:
If they are no threat to society, if they are unlikely to re-offend, and the loss of reputation, etc is the biggest punishment, and they are imprisoned, then prison is more about revenge than punishment, and it is likely to radicalise the offender, mixing with those other career and violent criminals.
In such instances of Sarkozy (i.e. unlikely to reoffend and no threat to society, etc ), it is more humane, more economical, more sensible to punish them in a civilised manner. They are, in effect, being subjected to the 'stocks' and public humiliation without the violence.
Except for the fact that other people who might be tempted act in a similar manner will see Sarkozy getting off likely.

Imprisonment is a deterrent as well as a punishment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top