Sorry, but this is important.

Awesome!!! Better than a cat!
cat
 
You post very much like the OP “Exactly”. It’s a little bit sad imho.

Men and women are identified biologically at birth. A sex change can change that I suppose. But putting a dress on and tucking your plums in doesn’t make you a women.
And what characteristics are used to assign the sex at birth?
 
Not a real woman though, king willy
How do you decide that? What characteristics did you use to decide that?

Nearly 20 pages of posts, and several days, no-one can (or is able to) offer a list of characteristics used to decide that a a woman is a woman.
All we get is the repetitive axiomatic "a woman is a woman", or "a woman is not a woman if she's not a woman", and "only women are allowed to use women only spaces".
If we can't determine who is a woman, and why, how can we stop those who are not women using those spaces?
 
Last edited:
One that no-one can answer apparently.
So it's an insoluble question, or a question that no-one knows the answer.
So how do we know who is allowed to use women-only spaces, and who is not?
You really need to ask how you know what sex a new born baby is?
 
You really need to ask how you know what sex a new born baby is?
I have, several times.
Here, I'll ask again: what characteristics are used to decide a baby is female?
HWM provided a list, none of which was verifiable at birth.
Considering this assigning of the sex lable at that time sticks with you for the rest of your life, anf it's very difficult to change it, you would think that there's a strict procedure for assigning sex at birth, and it shouldn't make mistakes
What characteristics are used to decide that the baby is female (or male)?
 
@MNW67 We need your analytical skills in this thread please

That's very kind.

But we had a very good and very long thread last year, where I learnt as much as I wanted to know about this issue. My old friend Sunshine was heavily involved in the discussion and taught me a lot.
 
That's very kind.

But we had a very good and very long thread last year, where I learnt as much as I wanted to know about this issue. My old friend Sunshine was heavily involved in the discussion and taught me a lot.
So this is one of those issues that are visited and revisited frequently?
Why would that be?
 
It is very important to the TransActivists to avoid admitting that a person who is not a woman is not entitled to access spaces and events that are reserved exclusively for women.

So they are anxious to throw in as many diversions as they can, such as "this man looks quite pretty in this artfully prepared photograph, so surely he should be allowed into a women's changing room in the middle of the night" and "there aren't many of them and quite a lot of them aren't violent criminals or sex offenders, so they should all be allowed in." We also get "some people have genetic abnormalities and physical deformities therefore all men should be allowed in." We've even had "a nomadic bronze age tribe in North Africa thousands of years ago didn't recognise variations and this is the reason people are prejudiced against them."

Now we're getting "plumbers and builders are not skilled at biological definitions therefore there is no difference between a man and a woman" and "a person I don't like supports women's rights therefore I deny the facts."

These attempts are all nonsense.

The simple truth is that women are entitled to single-sex spaces, and people who are not women are not entitled to access them.

The Trans Activist go to great lengths to avoid that truth.
 
Back
Top