You know that bit in the Highway Code that says "Flashing headlights means 'I am coming through'"? And you know how most people use it as a signal meaning completely the opposite? I found out that the Highway Code is definitely right on this one...
Driving home the other night, on a dark road, someone was driving towards me with mainbeams and foglights on (pr*ck). As he came closer, rounded a bend and was then facing right at me, the lights started to dazzle me. So I flashed my lights at him. Because I was momentarily dazzled, I hadn't noticed that the person behind him was now indicating to turn right. They saw my flashing, assumed I was letting them through and pulled across my path. Stupid of them to assume this, seeing as I was right on him by now and driving at 40mph (had slowed down due to dazzling), with no-one behind me, but people assume too much.
Luckily because one of the three people on that road could drive adequately (i.e. myself) there was no accident, but if I hadn't been able to brake in time, or had been going 2mph faster, then it would have been messy.
So, perhaps if people were forced to revise the Highway Code by way of a theory test every year, then this kind of thing would be drilled into them? They would see flashing lights and wouldn't think "Durrrrr, they must be letting me through durrrrrrr!", in fact the first guy wouldn't have been driving with football pitch floodlights on the front of his car. And when the police pull you there is no "I didn't know" excuse.
Driving home the other night, on a dark road, someone was driving towards me with mainbeams and foglights on (pr*ck). As he came closer, rounded a bend and was then facing right at me, the lights started to dazzle me. So I flashed my lights at him. Because I was momentarily dazzled, I hadn't noticed that the person behind him was now indicating to turn right. They saw my flashing, assumed I was letting them through and pulled across my path. Stupid of them to assume this, seeing as I was right on him by now and driving at 40mph (had slowed down due to dazzling), with no-one behind me, but people assume too much.
Luckily because one of the three people on that road could drive adequately (i.e. myself) there was no accident, but if I hadn't been able to brake in time, or had been going 2mph faster, then it would have been messy.
So, perhaps if people were forced to revise the Highway Code by way of a theory test every year, then this kind of thing would be drilled into them? They would see flashing lights and wouldn't think "Durrrrr, they must be letting me through durrrrrrr!", in fact the first guy wouldn't have been driving with football pitch floodlights on the front of his car. And when the police pull you there is no "I didn't know" excuse.