"They are trying to steal this election"

Presented as fact.

No good you back peddling Old Bean

I'm not you botchy no back peddling here.

I didn't know the word apparently meant fact. I must get re-educated

There was an error when they called it in Arizona they thought they counted 98% of the vote, it then transpired that they had only counted 86%.

No bull ****ting here.

There is also claims of voter fraud in other states. However there is no evidence to suggest it's true as yet.
 
:)

Apparently the SX Turbo is powered by a lawn-mower engine and cannot exceed 20 miles per hour.
JohnD i guess your lawnmower is a 4wheel drive variant needed for your uphill garden?

Do you do that a lot? Have your mates ever referred to you as a bulls hitter?
Mates.. says the lonely keyboard warrior looking for attention
 
Here Notch here boy.. "what is it with you RWR lot"... go on lad you can do it..
 
If Bidet wins it will be a victory for looters, arsonists, graffitiists, rioters and the violent in general.
 
I don't need to

You spread the nonsense, if you think there's any foundation to it, it's up to you to prove it.

"What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"

By the way, I hear you haven't been convicted of High Treason yet.
 
Do you know what an epistemological razor is?
 
I don't need to

You spread the nonsense, if you think there's any foundation to it, it's up to you to prove it.

"What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"

By the way, I hear you haven't been convicted of High Treason yet.

Your go to response then..

P.s I have provided links
 
"They are trying to steal this election"

Well, fancy that

478 out of 538 electoral college votes called

264 Joe Biden, DEMOCRAT
214 Donald Trump, REPUBLICAN

270 to win
Last updated 18 minutes ago

Biden is still in the lead.
 
Among 150-or-so million votes, there is bound to be a number of errors / ambiguities / discrepancies / frauds.
How some of those are categorised depends on whether the candidate thinks they're winning, or losing.
The number of these votes might be inconsequential though.
The US system does seem very open to argument though.
 
Lively discussion can be had without any need for throwing insults.

A casual observer would be forgiven for wondering why.
 
Among 150-or-so million votes, there is bound to be a number of errors / ambiguities / discrepancies / frauds.
How some of those are categorised depends on whether the candidate thinks they're winning, or losing.
The number of these votes might be inconsequential though.
The US system does seem very open to argument though.
Watch killchain cyberwar on americas voting, that really throws it open, all those voting machines are so hackable on a massive scale. It showed how one state had decided to 'upgrade' their machines from a single on to a two stage system where the vote booth spat out a barcoded ticket, which is completely unreadable by the human eye which you then scan to another machine to count 'the vote' incrediible.
 
Back
Top