Thinking of getting the booster

Which of the thousand-or-so wet markets was the 'rona first identified at?



That it was identified at the Wuhan wet market, rather than any one of the thousand-or-so others?

Do you know what the word "random" means?
 
Sponsored Links
So why is this 5th booster or whatever number it is only for the vulnerable or over 70 s
What has changed what testing has been done to say that under 70s no longer need it like they needed all the previous ones
 
The vulnerable ( and some workers) have always been prioritised.

Do you say that is wrong?
 
Sponsored Links
I had been in remission with CKD for over 15 years but was classed as highly vulnerable and urged to have the vaccination. After much thought and deliberation, (and more insistent urging by various people in the medical profession), I had the first two courses, with 12 weeks between them. Didn't have any ill effects but did notice that some of my blood and urine tests went a bit awry. I was told not to worry about them as they were still in acceptable limits. Time for the booster and I was a bit hesitant as my tests were still not back to normal, but again, I was urged to have the booster as it would be best for me. A month later, had the usual tests done and some results had dropped, and others had begun to climb. So started keeping a record on a spreadsheet and graphing my results. One particular result, (albumin: creatinine ratio, or ACR), began to rocket. Reading should preferably be zero but no more than 2.5mg Because of my CKD mine was usually around 13-20mg. After the booster it was climbing, week on week, and within 3 months it was in the low 50's mg I was told not to worry as they would only need to take action if it went over 300mg Over the following months it continued rising, with the odd occasional drop, until within 12 months it was at 297. The time for action had arrived and the best/safest treatment was a course of 2 doses of chemotherapy tailored to suit me personally. During my treatment I was to isolate as much as possible and use full Covid measures, i.e. if I HAD to go out it was face mask, sanitiser, no contact within 2 metres etc. So I was stuck at home most of the time having the odd Teams work meeting to keep in touch. Employers were very good, and I received full pay from mid February to the end of September. Sadly, although my tests are beginning to settle down, I am still not out of remission so still have to take precautions when we go out.
During my idle time at home, I started doing some research to see if the vacs had caused my relapse. At first there was denial everywhere I looked until I discovered a Canadian professor, working in England, who was running a research/screening programme because she was convinced people with CKD (and other autoimmune problems), should never have been vaccinated without more research being done first. It was her opinion that the vaccine had been rolled out far too quickly to be classed as safe for everyone. I am now part of her research and testing programme and a similar one being run by Oxford University. I have to send them my test results each month and, in her opinion, my case, along with many others, is showing there is a high probability that the vaccines did in fact cause me to come out of remission.
So, no chance of me getting this next dose or booster for anyone.
 
At first there was denial everywhere I looked until I discovered a Canadian professor, working in England, who was running a research/screening programme because she was convinced people with CKD (and other autoimmune problems), should never have been vaccinated without more research being done first. It was her opinion that the vaccine had been rolled out far too quickly to be classed as safe for everyone.
So, no chance of me getting this next dose or booster for anyone.
Scary, isn't it.
 
Sorry to hear that.

In her opinion, what would the probability of a bad outcome have been if you had a severe case of the infection?
I can't speak for the good doctor, but she would probably first point out her hippocratic oath, & then mention the possibility that only certain sections of our society really needed to be locked down.
 
I had been in remission with CKD for over 15 years but was classed as highly vulnerable and urged to have the vaccination. After much thought and deliberation, (and more insistent urging by various people in the medical profession), I had the first two courses, with 12 weeks between them. Didn't have any ill effects but did notice that some of my blood and urine tests went a bit awry. I was told not to worry about them as they were still in acceptable limits. Time for the booster and I was a bit hesitant as my tests were still not back to normal, but again, I was urged to have the booster as it would be best for me. A month later, had the usual tests done and some results had dropped, and others had begun to climb. So started keeping a record on a spreadsheet and graphing my results. One particular result, (albumin: creatinine ratio, or ACR), began to rocket. Reading should preferably be zero but no more than 2.5mg Because of my CKD mine was usually around 13-20mg. After the booster it was climbing, week on week, and within 3 months it was in the low 50's mg I was told not to worry as they would only need to take action if it went over 300mg Over the following months it continued rising, with the odd occasional drop, until within 12 months it was at 297. The time for action had arrived and the best/safest treatment was a course of 2 doses of chemotherapy tailored to suit me personally. During my treatment I was to isolate as much as possible and use full Covid measures, i.e. if I HAD to go out it was face mask, sanitiser, no contact within 2 metres etc. So I was stuck at home most of the time having the odd Teams work meeting to keep in touch. Employers were very good, and I received full pay from mid February to the end of September. Sadly, although my tests are beginning to settle down, I am still not out of remission so still have to take precautions when we go out.
During my idle time at home, I started doing some research to see if the vacs had caused my relapse. At first there was denial everywhere I looked until I discovered a Canadian professor, working in England, who was running a research/screening programme because she was convinced people with CKD (and other autoimmune problems), should never have been vaccinated without more research being done first. It was her opinion that the vaccine had been rolled out far too quickly to be classed as safe for everyone. I am now part of her research and testing programme and a similar one being run by Oxford University. I have to send them my test results each month and, in her opinion, my case, along with many others, is showing there is a high probability that the vaccines did in fact cause me to come out of remission.
So, no chance of me getting this next dose or booster for anyone.
And the trouble is those with a vested interest in the vaccine will do their best to debunk and call her a crank as they are doing with dalglesh and several other cancer specialist who have been voicing their concerns for some time now
 
And the trouble is those with a vested interest in the vaccine will do their best to debunk and call her a crank as they are doing with dalglesh and several other cancer specialist who have been voicing their concerns for some time now

Whatever you do don't go to a doctor when you are ill or a dentist when you need dental treatment just google it.

Save yourself the hassle. Whilst I have mentioned the above make sure your kids and missus don't either.
 
Whatever you do don't go to a doctor when you are ill or a dentist when you need dental treatment just google it.

Save yourself the hassle. Whilst I have mentioned the above make sure your kids and missus don't either.
yep dont listen to the cancer doctors seeing hundreds of patients that they have been monitoring and treating for several years so notice changes far quicker and whose only concern is their patients well being
 
Sorry to hear that.

In her opinion, what would the probability of a bad outcome have been if you had a severe case of the infection?
Unfortunately they can't give individual 'prognosis'(?), without actually seeing/treating those individuals. As they are a research unit, this means they don't actually see patients face to face. Just their symptoms/test results/reactions etc, as recorded by a practitioner/consultant. From the recorded data they receive and analyse, they give their opinions/conclusions on whether something was caused, may have been caused, or was not caused by a particular incident. As with all clinical research, the results may not be clear for a number of years.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top