To all those that welcome/encourage the small boat migrants.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yawn indeed.
I'd feel aggrieved if a migrant, a bloke on his holidays or an indigenous scrote assaulted my family. You speak as though a passport check, shields us all from dodgy holidaymakers. It doesn't. Just the same as posting pointless employment checks, when talking about people visiting here.
not true. educate yourself.

 
Yawn indeed.
I'd feel aggrieved if a migrant, a bloke on his holidays or an indigenous scrote assaulted my family. You speak as though a passport check, shields us all from dodgy holidaymakers. It doesn't. Just the same as posting pointless employment checks, when talking about people visiting here.
Some would have you believe that there are no foreigners in UK jails.

 

Anyway, back to the actual process. I just want someone to explain what has changed in the process since Labour took over. I am not trying to lay any trap or even make any point. I just want information. This is not an area I know much about. This is what Yvette Cooper said in July last year in Parliament. What are the 40% and 60% figures she is referring to. It's all a bit like gobbledy gook to me.

Under section 9 of the Act, people who arrive in the UK can claim asylum and get asylum accommodation. However, under section 30, if they arrived after March 2023 and meet key conditions in the Act, no decision can be taken on their case; they just stay in the asylum system. Even if they have come here unlawfully for economic reasons and should be returned to their home country, they will not be, because the law does not work.

The Home Office estimates that around 40% of asylum cases since March 2023 should be covered by those Illegal Migration Act conditions. The remaining 60%, under the previous Government’s policy, should still have been processed and cleared in the normal way. However, even though previous Ministers introduced this new law 12 months ago, they did not ever introduce an effective operational way for the Home Office to distinguish between the cases covered by the Illegal Migration Act and the other cases where decisions should continue—that is, between the 40% and the 60%. As a result, decisions cannot be taken on any of them.

I have been shocked to discover that the Home Office has effectively stopped making the majority of asylum decisions. Thousands of asylum caseworkers cannot do their proper job. As a result, the backlog of asylum cases is now going up.
 
Last edited:
Nonsense. Are you suggesting its impossible for a visitor with a clean passport, to break the law in the UK?
No - but nice try.
You speak as though a passport check, shields us all from dodgy holidaymakers. It doesn't. Just the same as posting pointless employment checks, when talking about people visiting here.
So now you are aware of the organisation that uses passport and travel checks to catch thousands every year.
 
Last edited:
You speak as though a passport check, shields us all from dodgy holidaymakers.
Of course it doesn’t but in the same way that cyclists jump red lights because they have no way of being identified compared to something with a registration plate, some unchecked migrants in this country feel free to do as they like. If they get caught they can always use a different name and who would know?
 
And yet compared to most of Europe, despite all of the above, SA was and still:

- is poorer
- has a much greater degree of wealth inequality
- has greater levels of corruption
- has more crime overall, and significantly more violent crime
- has a much lower quality of life overall
- has a much lower life expectancy


(y)
But they are not importing those problems, are they?
 
Of course it doesn’t but in the same way that cyclists jump red lights because they have no way of being identified compared to something with a registration plate, some unchecked migrants in this country feel free to do as they like. If they get caught they can always use a different name and who would know?
So we should process them and do the checks before arrival?
 
But they are not importing those problems, are they?
56 pages in this thread and so far Mottie has not provided any evidence that anybody here welcomes or encourages small boats

is Mottie going to admit this thread is based on a lie
 
So we should process them and do the checks before arrival?
If we did, what do you think would happen to those that we don’t want in? Do you think they’ll just shrug their shoulders, say ‘it’s a fair cop guv' and toddle off back to where they came from?
 
If we did, what do you think would happen to those that we don’t want in? Do you think they’ll just shrug their shoulders, say ‘it’s a fair cop guv' and toddle off back to where they came from?
So we leave it the way it is?
 
No - but nice try
So now you know passport checks are irrelevant to those that travel on a fake or another's passport or those that intend committing crime once they are here.

So now you are aware of the organisation that uses passport and travel checks to catch thousands every year.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
poor try 0/10.
 
So now you know passport checks are irrelevant to those that travel on a fake or another's passport or those that intend committing crime once they are here.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
poor try 0/10.
yep you must try harder to educate yourself. Its not too late even for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top