Totally predictable: Trump discusses giving land to Russia

[Highway Man]

Ukraine are struggling to hold them back even with billions of $$ that has been provided to them along with the Wests superior weapons, Russia are winning hands down and achieving a lot more than what Ukraine are. Russia is not a backward country,

 

[Highway Man]

Amazing how stupid they are in here that they think the russians have been playing serious so far

I think people will be shocked when they mobilise, their military capacity has decreased but not enough for NATO to take them on, hence why they havent.

 

[Highway Man]

Without America NATO is defunct, I wouldn't rely on American support against Russia. Putin knows it too.

 

[gas112]

After a few years of supplying ukraine the US , GB , Germany and several other countries are at record lows of ammunition reserves down to less than a couple of weeks with the US saying it will take them several years to build up stocks again of certain rockets etc .
Russia at record production and stocks and with the back up of other nations with vast stock and half wits in here think they will be a push over

 

[denso13]

but not enough for NATO to take them on, hence why they havent.

NATO are having a good laugh at how poor they have turned out to be. No one guessed just how bad they are.

 

[Highway Man]

Russia has not run out of steam; the Russian military remains a capable and resilient adversary, capable of sustaining its operational tempo, though it has sustained significant personnel and material losses in the war in Ukraine and shifted to infantry-focused assaults to mitigate heavy equipment losses. Despite some financial and equipment challenges, Russia has mobilized its defense industry to increase production and manpower, allowing it to continue fighting and reconstituting its forces faster than many expected

 

[Highway Man]

NATO are having a good laugh at how poor they have turned out to be. No one guessed just how bad they are.

Really, you mean you are sat in your arm chair

 

[gas112]

Just wondering with all talk of nato etc in here
Who do you think we should support when two nato countries go into conflict against each other that may happen.
Turkey enters gazza to stop the genocide by the jews . America then backs the jews even more when it escalate who does the UK support as its two nato countries fighting

 

[Highway Man]

NATO are having a good laugh at how poor they have turned out to be. No one guessed just how bad they are.

Such a laugh that they could last a fraction of the time Russia can, Once again making things up in your head. Russia will take the whole of Ukraine if they continue, yeah really bad they are. doing.

 

[denso13]

Really, you mean you are sat in your arm chair

We both are.

 

[Highway Man]

We both are.

Actually yes, but only one of us is a veteran of NATO and that isnt you.

 

[denso13]

Such a laugh that they could last a fraction of the time Russia can,

They wouldn't have to, it would be over in weeks.

 

[denso13]

Actually yes, but only one of us is a veteran of NATO and that isnt you.

Yea, they did have some who would surrender too quickly unfortunately.

 

[Highway Man]

They wouldn't have to, it would be over in weeks.

thats what putin thought

 

[blup]

so you think nato expanding into ukraine was not a threat despite the americans saying it would never happen ?

I'm not sure they did other than making vague reassurances in the late 80's in the context of german reunification. That was before Pootin created an ultra nationalist Russsia. You're spouting the Kremlinn line.