- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 13,132
- Reaction score
- 3,093
- Country
Any proof in your highly intellectual & well thought out responses ? The onus is on you to give links to your findings, don't try and worm your way out as you always do.
Homeless people's deaths 'up 24%' over five years
- Thread starter JP_
- Start date
- Status
Sponsored Links
True,
It is certainly hard to see how any foreign person could be anything but an improvement on the worst of UK chavs........
You must live in a real sh1t hole if that is the case and depending on where you are in London that can be quite true. I don't see anyone spouting the virtues of chav scum though, the overall sentiment I would like is to stop allowing the conditions that propagate such a destructive mentality. Blair's benefits system strongly encouraged the lowest in society to scrounge and feel justified in doing it, now two or three generations are on benefits. Anyone would think it was a sinister plot all along to destroy the white working class in order to create a vaccum which would very soon be filled with cheap migrant labour.
?
Things have moved on since then boyo. Didn't you know, we have had a Tory government for the last 8 years.
Blair lol.
Sponsored Links
Only nutters like you.
S
sodthisforfun
Pretty impressive maths, considering Blair was in power just about 1 generation ago. You so dearly like to make up stuff to suit your anti-foreigner views don't ya?
Hawkeye must be talking about the years of Thatcherism
Did you mean the period when social mobility improved?
Social mobility improved in the 80s and 90s, new analysis has found, but there are warnings that the trend may now be going backwards.
Analysis by the Office for National Statistics found that the chances of moving up social classes improved between 1981-91, when grocer’s daughter Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister, and 1991-2001 when she was succeeded by the son of circus entertainers, John Major.
For men, the chances of improving their social standing increased from 32.7% in 1981-91 to 37.7% in 1991-2001, while women closed the gap, rising from 26.8% to 36.4%
I refer to the period when industrial jobs declined and unemployment rose above 3 million.
I observed that you referred to the destruction of the working class.
Yes, I think that moving from "skilled worker on good wage in regular employment" to "hopeless unemployed dependent on handouts in a town reduced to poverty" is certainly "social mobility." But I wouldn't describe it as "improvement" like you do.
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,469
- Reaction score
- 541
- Country
Labour were in Power for 13yrs. So two or three generations in 13 years. We are talking about humans not fruit flies.
D
durhamplumber
I grew up on council estates,still visit plenty relatives on them,work on them,,and all the crap I have ever had is off whites..Bullies at school,all whites,drug dealers,all whites,drunken toxxers all white,,etc,,,maybe the demographics are different your way!.
Yes, there is.
If you look at this
and this
and this
you will see that there is no proof that there's a shortage of council houses because we give them to third world chancers and parasites, there is no proof that "they" want to be homeless and begging, and there is no proof that we are housing third world immigrants at the expense of our own people
What you term "worming out" is actually the discomfort you experience when your fantasy about the way something works collides with reality, because reality always wins.
If the above links haven't made it clear to you how you have if all AAF, try this simple analogy:
Fred tells Joe that a book contains a certain word.
Joe says it does not.
Fred challenges Joe to prove that it does not.
The only way that Joe can do that is to quote the entire book and say "that word is not there".
Unworkable. Fred is the one making the assertion so it behoves Fred to prove the validity of it, and to show that his assertion is not just an invention.
If ReganAndCarter says "Fact - we give these houses to third world chancers and parasites" then it is down to him to prove that it is a fact, and not some bigoted, ignorant fantasy.
If Woody claims that homeless people want to live on the streets, begging, then it is down to him to prove that that is true, and not a product of his febrile imagination.
If ReganAndCarter asks why we are housing immigrants at the expense of our own people then it is down to him to prove that we are, and that he hasn't just made that up.
I know that you think the way it should work is that you make some assertion, e.g. "there are herds of flying unicorns living in caves on the dark side of the Moon", and then take the position that if people cannot prove that there are not then it must be true.
But nobody capable of intelligent reasoning thinks that way.
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 13,132
- Reaction score
- 3,093
- Country
So all pi55 & wind from big gob again, wormed out again. I'm surprised you didn't give a link to Wikipedia or mumsnet.
Woody, hatejob and Reagan, however...
- Status
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
- Locked
