Tommy Robinson fight back against BBC corruption

[Notch7]

You can dismiss as irrelevant if one article discusses practices in other countries, when the topic of debate is practices in this country.
Which the article posted by sodthisforfun did so.
The article that I posted is more uptodate, relevant to the abuse in this country, by more people with more expertise in the field and founded on better research.

It was an article about religious practices. Your the one that brought different religions into the discussion.

So the article is far more relevant than the the link you posted, which wasnt written by an expert, old bean.

 

[jasonzyx]

When I lived abroad in different countries, I respected local laws, religions and cultural ways. But it did not change who I was fundamentally. I am a product of my parents, my grandparents and my country, and have those peers instilled in the way I think to a certain extent. It's unavoidable.

So why shouldn't we talk about practices in other countries? If people are carrying out cultural practices from other countries in the UK, which IN the UK is not only a morally wrong issue, but an illegal issue like the Asian grooming and things like FGM, we surely should not dismiss the origins of such practices. To do so is short-sighted.

I don't disagree, but the article that you presented was about practices in other countries. It was a comparison of moralities in different cultures.
It was irrelevant to the abuse in this country.

 

[sodthisforfun]

I don't disagree, but the article that you presented was about practices in other countries. It was a comparison of moralities in different cultures.
It was irrelevant to the abuse in this country.

You're not listening again.

It certainly does hold some relevance. Is any child rape not a question of moralities?

 

[Vinty]

Racist!

I am not a racist I am quoting Darwin, I don't believe in the theory of evolution as it stands.

 

[jasonzyx]

It was an article about religious practices. Your the one that brought different religions into the discussion.

It was an article about cultural practices in other countries.
There is nothing religious about having sex slaves, nor young male children as sex slaves.
Although it may happen in the Catholic church as well.

 

[Notch7]

So it can't be extrapolated to the Muslim community as a whole.

Not relevant.

Not the point I discussed.

Youve avoided the key issue.

Are you saying TR thinks it is the whole Muslim community that are in raping gangs.

 

[jasonzyx]

So the article is far more relevant than the the link you posted, which wasnt written by an expert, old bean.

Ella Cockbain, a lecturer in security and crime science, is an expert on child sexual exploitation.
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...e-asians-we-dont-know-if-that-figure-is-right​

 

[sodthisforfun]

It was an article about cultural practices in other countries.
There is nothing religious about having sex slaves, nor young male children as sex slaves.
Although it may happen in the Catholic church as well.

An article about the cultural acceptance of such practices. And as I said in my previous posts, the way we are brought up and the way we are doesn't always change no matter where we move to.
As I said, it's an important part of understanding because for change to come about is to understand and then educate.

 

[Notch7]

It was an article about cultural practices in other countries.
There is nothing religious about having sex slaves, nor young male children as sex slaves.
Although it may happen in the Catholic church as well.

Obsessed about the Catholic church.

Are you Catholic?

 

[jasonzyx]

Are you saying TR thinks it is the whole Muslim community that are in raping gangs.

Bodd clearly believes that TR has a problem with the whole of Islam.
You are conflating the issue with irrelevancies.

 

[jasonzyx]

Obsessed about the Catholic church.

Are you Catholic?

Silly irrelevancies!

 

[Vinty]

Not at all.

I am saying that TR concentrates his attention on the abuse by Pakistani men for the advancement of his Islamophobia.

If he was really concerned about abuse of children, he would also be concerned about the abuse by catholic leaders, which is far more vile and endemic, than that perpetrated by Pakistani men.
But not a peep from him about the abuse by Catholic leaders.

Could be TR doesn't talk about clerical abuse is because he has an Irish Catholic heritage.

 

[jasonzyx]

I am not a racist I am quoting Darwin, I don't believe in the theory of evolution as it stands.

Fair do's. I withdraw my accusation and I apologise.
It was caused by me speed reading of your post, and failing to understand and accept your real position.
I have now read your original post more slowly, and I accept that my accusation was hasty and ill-founded.

 

[Bodd]

From what I recall, the islamic abuse of white children is personal to him, someone he knew (I cannot remember if it was a close friend or family member) was raped by pakistani men. (I am trying to find the facts on this but there is a lot to wade through.)
He cannot fight the fight against all abuses.
Besides, why should he do anything about catholic priests, the pope is on the case now.

As for "a small number of pakistan's" it has been shown that it is in fact a high percentage of pakistani men that are abusing children and all under the cover of their centuries old holy book that tells them it is good to do so and they generally get away with it because the British authorities won't stop them.

Try a talk he did at Oxford University

 

[EFLImpudence]

It was caused by me speed reading of your post, and failing to understand and accept your real position.
I have now read your original post more slowly, and I accept that my accusation was hasty and ill-founded.

Ah - an explanation for all the errors.

Reread all the others where you have done that.