Boris

[ellal]

MPs need to define the law - it doesn't need to be constitutional, which btw we already have.

We do not have a written constitution.

Our law is based on conventions, statutes and precedents...

But the highest authority in the land is parliament.

And bojo acted unlawfully in bypassing parliament.

You can squirm all you like, but the fact remains that 11 people in the highest court in the land (and who know a hell of a lot more about this than you or I)made their judgement that this was the case...

Now suck it up

Edit: I thought quitters believe that Europe always has the final say?

So why hasn't bojo appealed to the European court?

 

[SirGalahad]

Ph Boris. You wanted to set up a £100m investment fund with that Blonde Model.

Mr Johnson, 55, revealed plans for the fund at a summit organised by Innotech Network, founded by Ms Arcuri, 34, in October 2013. He said: “We want to support more tech ventures in the Middle East, around the Muslim world, with a new fund. The idea is to bring together London tech firms and tech pioneers with the Arab world.”

 

[JP_]

Here's the man ruining, sorry, running, our country.

An absolute muppet talking BS. Starts talking about Zeus. ****.

 

[SirGalahad]

Here's the man ruining, sorry, running, our country.

An absolute muppet talking BS. Starts talking about Zeus. ****.

You should be afraid of this maniac.

 

[SirGalahad]

fintech,Biotech, edtech, miltech?, nanotech, greentech

I love that jingle.

 

[JohnD]

Here's the man ruining, sorry, running, our country

You were right the first time.

It's almost incredible that 0.1% of the population were so stupid that they voted this dishonest, lieing, shameless buffoon into a position of power.

 

[durhamplumber]

You were right the first time.

It's almost incredible that 0.1% of the population were so stupid that they voted this dishonest, lieing, shameless buffoon into a position of power.

Yes..of course..you are a proper democrat..Govern by referendum... Wait a minute.....oh yes..only the ones you win though.otherwise ignore

 

[durhamplumber]

So why hasn't bojo appealed to the European court?

No deal brexit.Asap.

 

[jj4091]

Which law did he break?

I think that was my question was it not?

No law broken

So why was yet more money wasted on an outcome that served little purpose other than allow MPs to go back to work & waste more money.

 

[FrodoOne]

ellal wrote

We do not have a written constitution.

Our law is based on conventions, statutes and precedents...

But the highest authority in the land is parliament.

BUT, is that really true?
Is not the "highest authority in the land" the "people" who elected the parliament.
(The "parliament" being the body who has the "authority" to "parlay" (talk to) the Monarch.)

(However, in the UK, in contrast with Australia (and the USA) the "people" did NOT elect the "upper house" of "parliament".)

That "authority" of the people in the UK to "parlay" with the Monarch has come up, over time, from "Barons" (see Magna Carta, Runnymede, 15 June 1215) to Male landholders, to Male Subjects of the Monarch (over a certain age) and now to all Subjects of the Monarch (over a certain age).

(While in many other countries the term "Citizen" is used, in the UK and other British Commonwealth countries. all who consider that they are "citizens" are, actually, "Subjects of the Monarch".
They elect their "Governments" to "parley" with their Monarch as to the laws of the country concerned. (Hence "Parliament".)
The UK and other British Commonwealth Countries do just that when the Subjects in those countries elect representatives to "parley" with their Monarch so that the "Prime Minister" (Chief Advisor to the Monarch) of that Monarchy may advise the said Monarch (or the representative of the Monarchy, being a Governor General) as to the Laws which should be enacted by the Monarch or His/Her representative.)

Any such Monarch (or representative of such Monarchy) would be well advised not to ignore any such advice, at their own peril.

 

[wobs]

ellal wrote


(While in many other countries the term "Citizen" is used, in the UK and other British Commonwealth countries. all who consider that they are "citizens" are, actually, "Subjects of the Monarch".

Not since the early 1980s.

We are British citizens. Only a few are subjects.

 

[Notch7]

No deal brexit.Asap.

No Brexit Asap.

 

[JP_]

No Brexit Asap.

No deal brexit.Asap.

No more TALK of Brexit ASAP!

 

[durhamplumber]

It's hilarious that quitters accuse remainers of using every legitimate tactic to delay/derail Brexit...

And they then start doing the same themselves (and now using illegitimate tactics by ignoring the highest court in the land) in defence of their lying tin pot dictator when he has acted unlawfully!

They appear not to want to live in a lawful democracy and are in blind pursuit of something that cannot be had...

Brexit truly is a cult!

A different court thought it was nothing to do with them...3 judges told him ok to prorogue parliament....Before you become ahead of yourself

 

[durhamplumber]

That which is contrary to law. “Unlawful” and “illegal” are frequently used as synonymous terms, but, in the proper sense of the word, “unlawful,” as applied to promises, agreements, considerations, and the like, denotes that they are ineffectual in law because they involve acts which, although not illegal, i. e., positively forbidden, are disapproved of by the law, and are therefore not recognized as the ground of legal rights, either because they are immoral or because they are against public policy

As said.no law broken then.