Corbyn heckler suspended

[ReJect]

oh, here's one of the proofs...

Oh, but hang on ... it's somebody else - a member of the IRA has confirmed that this is actually Jim Gibney, Corbyn was never there!
https://fullfact.org/online/not-picture-jeremy-corbyn-ira/

Yes, that has been shown before and known not to be Jeremy Corbyn.

Offers no proof of Corbyn being innocent of supporting terrorists though.

 

[JP_]

Offers no proof of Corbyn being innocent of supporting terrorists though.

This was one of the so-called proofs that he did support terrorists. The fact that it fake is pretty good proof that he is innocent. Why fake it if there is real evidence?

 

[ReJect]

Do you have any proof? Every photo and claim circled so far has been debunked as fake news. Every claim that he supports terrorists or anitsemitism have been proven to be false.
It's all made up by the anti-labour press.

This article covers most claims.

Well Corbyn hasn’t done a very good job of proving he is against antisemitism. I thought a lot of the claims against him came from within his party, not just the Press.
“Every claim that he supports terrorists....have been proven to be false” ???
Are you sure about that?
Or are you just a diehard Labour/Corbyn supporter and do not wish to think of Corbyn’s past?
Corbyn is an armchair terrorist supporter and probably never has experienced deaths or danger directly from terrorism to him or his family.

 

[JohnD]

I have seen no proof of ReJect being innocent of supporting terrorists.

 

[ReJect]

This was one of the so-called proofs that he did support terrorists. The fact that it fake is pretty good proof that he is innocent. Why fake it if there is real evidence?

Where did it originate from?
That photo was probably eagerly used by someone because it would put JC together with gunmen in one photo, and would have been very difficult to explain for an English Labour member to be seen there, had it been actually him.
Photos are sometimes deliberately used as wrong evidence. It happens to others.
Not sure how one photo of one fake story amounts to Corbyn being in the clear for all the other photos, video, or paperwork evidence and his political career record he has done.
Wonder do we have any photos of Corbyn with other sides to any groups he was known to associate with? Those photos might be rare.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Well Corbyn hasn’t done a very good job of proving he is against antisemitism.

It depends what is meant by anti-semitism.

If every criticism of some one were defined as anti-{whatever religion they were} then everyone would be anti-{something} and therefore 'racist'.

 

[JP_]

Well Corbyn hasn’t done a very good job of proving he is against antisemitism.

What, apart from saying that he is? And an independent enquiry found that the labour party has done what it should have done, and that there is no evidence of Corbyn being antisemitic ...

“Every claim that he supports terrorists....have been proven to be false” ???
Are you sure about that?

Well, I cannot be sure, but I have not seen any claim actually get upheld. Have you? Please share it.

Or are you just a diehard Labour/Corbyn supporter and do not wish to think of Corbyn’s past?

No, not at all. I'm not voting labour. But just because I am not supporting Corbyn does not mean I will sit by in silence and ignore lies being spread about him and his party - this is how democracy dies. Do this, and the terrorists have already won.

Corbyn is an armchair terrorist supporter and probably never has experienced deaths or danger directly from terrorism to him or his family.

"Probably" - yes, a sure sign you just made something up in the hope it strengthens your weakening argument. And why is that relevant? I have never experienced deaths or danger directly from terrorism - does this mean I support terrorists?

 

[JP_]

Where did it originate from?

It was an IRA funeral. I don't know the details, but that info is freely available online should you wish to find out.

 

[ReJect]

I have seen no proof of ReJect being innocent of supporting terrorists.

Exactly! And I have seen no evidence that you haven’t supported terrorists.
Difficult to prove against a person unless they are caught in terrorist acts or if they give clear expression of support.

I would rather avoid getting involved with people I have an issue with instead of murdering or supporting murder of them.
I don’t think Corbyn has the ability to understand conflicts.
But I accept comments I make against Corbyn will be offensive to some of those that support him.

 

[JohnD]

ReJect hasn’t done a very good job of proving he is against antisemitism

 

[JohnD]

ReJect is an armchair terrorist supporter

 

[JohnD]

Probably few victims or their families would want to meet ReJect. I know I wouldn’t.

 

[ReJect]

"Probably" - yes, a sure sign you just made something up in the hope it strengthens your weakening argument. And why is that relevant? I have never experienced deaths or danger directly from terrorism - does this mean I support terrorists?

I think we can safely be sure that Corbyn has no direct experience with what terrorism does.
If anyone has any evidence of Corbyn in the past trying to condemn terrorists, please do show it.

Of course that doesn’t mean Jonbey you support terrorists just because you fortunately haven’t experienced the reality of it.
But it does mean you are living in a peace bubble, and more likely to be ignorant of reality of terrorism and how it achieves support.

 

[EFLImpudence]

But I accept comments I make against Corbyn will be offensive to some of those that support him.

It is just another example of blatant anti-caucasianism

 

[ReJect]

ReJect is an armchair terrorist supporter

...says John, the supporter of Corbyn.

Probably few victims or their families would want to meet ReJect. I know I wouldn’t.

Not sure how that wording was supposed to make sense? Was it merely an attempt at being derogatory just for the sake of it?
On reply to your comment - I think the opposite. I am sure I can have a lot of understanding with victims of terrorists and have some experience of it.
No such a thing as a good terrorist.