Vaccination cock up!

Sponsored Links
Interesting vid, bit long but worthwhile for any minds open to information other than the msm. Durham, look away. Might get a few thinking, and once again - you guessed it, Durham that doesn't include you. :)

 
Mrs Mottie who does some work for the NHS, received a nice internal email today. As a thank you to all NHS workers who worked through the pandemic, they have been given a day off on their next birthday. She's well chuffed.

Unpaid though:ROFLMAO:
 
Sponsored Links
What if her birthday falls on a Sunday?
She is only part time but her birthday is one of her working days. For those whose birthday falls on a weekend or a non-working day, they can take any day off in their birthday week.
 
Small population and they've negotiated a great deal with Pfizer in exchange for data.

The secrets to Israel’s coronavirus vaccination success – POLITICO
It seems the data doesn't quite meet Pfizer's expectations...

"COVID-19: UK to look 'very carefully' at vaccine dosing after concerns raised over level of protection"

"Answering questions from Sky News viewers, Sir Patrick was asked about an analysis from Israel, where the Pfizer jab has been rolled out the fastest.
That study suggested the effectiveness of the vaccine after a single dose was as low as 33% - rather than the 89% that had initially been thought.
 
My point was, that as Israel are giving the second dose to every one, they have no data to show that not giving the second dose reduces effectiveness,
It depends when and how they're doing it.


I don't think they've released details but if they're just looking at the period between Jab1 and Jab2 three weeks later then it's a storm in a teacup. Protection during that time is expected to be partial an increasing over time. Averaging it out during that time at 32% doesn't feel grossly wrong.

If they're following our approach and waiting a long time for the second jab then it's more worrying news.

Israel has been vaccinating harder and faster than we have, they're dishing doses out at a high enough % that you should be able to see the effects at a population level.
 
Looks like government's own 'stats' are even more unreliable than previously thought. National PHE stats for people testing positive for Covid are based on people who tested positive up to 60 days before dying. So test positive beginning of Jan, fall out of a window late Feb - and bingo - you're a Covid 'stat'.

With criteria like this, their 'figures' will keep this farce rolling in perpetuity.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...med-england-deaths-report-to-31-december-2020
 
Looks like government's own 'stats' are even more unreliable than previously thought. National PHE stats for people testing positive for Covid are based on people who tested positive up to 60 days before dying. So test positive beginning of Jan, fall out of a window late Feb - and bingo - you're a Covid 'stat'.

With criteria like this, their 'figures' will keep this farce rolling in perpetuity.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...med-england-deaths-report-to-31-december-2020

Not that old chestnut again. Fact till last thurs

DeathWk2.png


And when the death certificate count arrives it will be higher.
 
Interesting vid, bit long but worthwhile for any minds open to information other than the msm. Durham, look away. Might get a few thinking, and once again - you guessed it, Durham that doesn't include you. :)

Nee worries...never watch any COVID bolony you post.
 
I'll ask you again:

How/why did you decide that the Pope was head of a giant conspiracy (not theory) and therefore wrong?
Are we talking religion,Covid or other??The pope is head of a giant Religion/brainwashing exercise/Con/theory....Use which ever word you prefer..Which comment how far back are you referring to?
 
The pope is head of a giant Religion/brainwashing exercise/Con/theory....
I'm sure that EFLImpudence is more than capable of speaking for himself, but as a bystander in this discussion, it is obvious that you have not answered his specific question. He didn't ask you if you had decided, he asked you how or why you decided. I have highlighted the important word in his question.
I'll ask you again:

How/why did you decide that the Pope was head of a giant conspiracy (not theory) and therefore wrong?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top