Amnesty for

That might get them so far, but I cannot see how sharing a fake ID between several people will get past schools, doctors, getting vaccines and council homes.
And if they are sharing the benefits, then only 1 of them is getting them, not all of them ...
 
I don't think covid 19 knows about your immigration status, so makes sense to vaccinate regardless of status.
 
I don't think covid 19 knows about your immigration status, so makes sense to vaccinate regardless of status.
Precisely. Not to vaccinate risks the continuation of the virus among the population.
Woody, et al might prefer that in order to persist in his persecution of immigrants. His bigotry overrides his logic.
 
That might get them so far, but I cannot see how sharing a fake ID between several people will get past schools, doctors, getting vaccines and council homes.
And if they are sharing the benefits, then only 1 of them is getting them, not all of them ...
You can't use logic to refute illogical bigotry.
 
I don't think covid 19 knows about your immigration status, so makes sense to vaccinate regardless of status.
This is all very true, but could we not round them up and deport them instead? Just shocking how many illegals are possibly in the UK, even the looney left guard-onion has it down as a million
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...mented-migrants-could-go-hungry-say-charities. And even if we can't deport them these numbers should be a wake up call to tighten up the borders.

I guess living in possibly the worlds greatest country makes the UK such a desirable destination. And now we have brexit the UK is going to be an even greater attraction considering the countries that neighbour us.
 
Just shocking how many illegals are possibly in the UK, even the looney left guard-onion has it down as a million
How many of those so-called illegals, are student over-stayers, children of the Windrush generation, etc?
You need to remember UK currently has a racist PM, and a failing government, so any opportunity to stir up hatred against any group (by contributors who make it their hobby horse, but their hobby horse is allowed to remain :rolleyes:) that by definition have no voice, will be gleefully exploited.
 
Evidently some posters blatant hobby horse of promoting hatred and division against foreigners and immigrants is perfectly acceptable on DIYnot. This thread is one such example.
But dare to post a BBC/OU educational video explaining the myth about the definition of race, and it is deleted on the pretext that it's a hobby horse of mine.
Well, I'd better advise the BBC and the OU that their videos are not acceptable material on DIYnot.

As promised, I have advised the BBC that their videos were not considered appropriate material for DIYnot.
Comment to BBC reprinted below:
Hello, I thought your videos in conjunction with OU were excellent, especially the one about the Myth of Race. I thought it so enlightening that I posted a link to that video on DIYnot.com social media site, to draw others attention to it. Sadly, although many discussions on this site tend to promote hatred and division against foreigners and immigrants, your video was not considered appropriate and was deleted. It certainly demonstrates that not only are some social media participants overtly racist, but also the moderators of such social media sites share the views of their contributors.​
 
Last edited:
Now we've reclaimed our borders, why not have an amnesty and start taxing these unregistered migrants. I've always thought it should be like planning permission, if you've been living here for four years and kept your nose clean, why not make it official?
 
1.2 million people, that would suggest that for every 50 homes, one of them is full of illegal immigrants.
More than 10 years ago, a GP receptionist customer of mine told me of 30, yes, thirty people in her surgery in Canning Town were registered at one address in a block of flats.
 
Bye, bye Booby! :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
If I'm banned because a BBC/OU video is considered inappropriate viewing for a DIYnot audience, so be it.
I've yet to advise the OU, via twitter that their video is not allowed on DIYnot.
The BBC have responded:
Thank you for taking the time to send us your comments. We appreciate all the feedback we receive as it plays an important role in helping to shape our decisions.

This is an automated message (sorry that we can’t reply individually) to let you know that we’ve read your comments and will report them overnight to staff across the BBC for them to read too (after removing any personal details). This includes our programme makers, commissioning editors and senior management.

Thanks again for contacting the BBC.

BBC Audience Services.
And for when I'm banned, bye bye to you too.
 
1.2 mill my arse. That’s just the Asians. Funny how the students seem to end up moving their parents. & extended family here.
 
If you did that IT, it would be a free for all...
We would end up with half of France trying to cross the channel. How bad must France be for thousands to risk there lives escaping it.
 
More than 10 years ago, a GP receptionist customer of mine told me of 30, yes, thirty people in her surgery in Canning Town were registered at one address in a block of flats.
Not unusual for a shelter for the homeless.
It's unfortunate that there are so many homeless people.
 
Back
Top