Define low skilled. Brickies? Plasterers? Plumbers? Electricians? Carpenters? Painters? Site workers? Hospitality workers? Nurses? Care home workers? Car washers? Nail bar workers? Hospitality workers? Cleaners? Shouldn’t they be the ones we should have been protecting instead of bettering the lives of European low skilled workers?
Brickies? Plasterers? Plumbers? Electricians? Carpenters? Painters? Site workers? Hospitality workers? Nurses? Care home workers? Car washers? Nail bar workers? Hospitality workers? Cleaners?
Are they all low skilled? If not, what is the relevance to "
bettering the lives of European low skilled workers"?
What we should have been doing was to have been having strong protection of workers rights so that wages could not be undercut.
What we shoud have been doing was to have been having effective housing provision and strong regulation so that undercutting by living in poor conditions was impossible.
What we shoud have been doing was to have been investing in training so that there were no shortages of brickies, plasterers, plumbers, electricians etc.
What we shoud have been doing was to have been structuring an educational system where vocational qualifications were as valued, both practically and societally, as "academic" ones.
What we should not have been doing was decades of under-investment, public-school snobbery, and libertarian political and economic vandalism which created a whole raft of problems which the racists and the xenophobes could then blame on "the foreigners".