Go Austria!

So what? Nothing to do with my claim that natural immunity plus the vaccine is the best defence, as the report concludes.




==============================================
Active live links are required here onwards for any claims about Covid
Provide links denso provide links
 
Sponsored Links
So what? Nothing to do with my claim that natural immunity plus the vaccine is the best defence, as the report concludes.




==============================================
Active live links are required here onwards for any claims about Covid
The irony
 
people my age have died throughout my entire life i know walk about in bubble wrap breathing pure oxygen to reduce my risk
I posted proof that vaccine immunity is far better than natural immunity.

Since you’ve not responded I presume you admit that you were wrong.

Ao when are you going to retract your misleading post….I am sure you wouldn’t want misleading information staying visible.
 
Sponsored Links
That doesn't make sense - semantically.
Semantically, you might be correct, but I suspect we can all understand what Notch7 intended.
But as we're all busy people, sometimes we rattle off sentences that could be improved with a little more time.
Would you like to improve his sentence, or shall I?

How about something along the lines of:
"I posted proof that protection provided by vaccination is far better than relying on natural immunity"
 
"I posted proof that protection provided by vaccination is far better than relying on natural immunity"
Nope. That still doesn't make sense.

You have proved many times that you are not good at semantics.

What do you think 'natural immunity' means?
 
Nope. That still doesn't make sense.

You have proved many times that you are not good at semantics.

What do you think 'natural immunity' means?
Why don't you have a go at improving Notch7's sentence instead of making sarcastic and obscure remarks.?
 
As is the frequent cry on the forum - "Answer my question before asking others.".
You're continuing with your sarcastic and obscure comments rather than attempting to resolve the issue.
If we are to resolve the issue, you need to make some positive contribution to the discussion. Continuous negative, derisory and obscure comments won't do it.

You ridiculed Notch7's sentence but are incapable of improving it, and you refuse to try.
Can I suggest, politely, that you go and play with someone your own age.
 
You're continuing with your sarcastic and obscure comments rather than attempting to resolve the issue.
Obviously you don't know what 'sarcastic' and 'obscure' means.

If we are to resolve the issue, you need to make some positive contribution to the discussion. Continuous negative, derisory and obscure comments won't do it.
It appears to suffice for you.

You ridiculed Notch7's sentence but are incapable of improving it, and you refuse to try.
I did not ridicule Notch. I merely said - politely - that what he wrote did not make sense; which it did not.

Can I suggest, politely, that you go and play with someone your own age.
No. Don't be ageist.
 
I did not ridicule Notch. I merely said - politely - that what he wrote did not make sense; which it did not.
You're persisting with your negative, derisory and obscure remarks.
Why not try making a positive contribution to a discussion. You might like it, and it definitely would give better results.
How do you think Notch7's sentence could be improved to provide better semantic sense?

It isn't ageist to ridicule your juvenile and antagonistic behaviour.
 
Exactly. Which is why the vaccine helps ...
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top