Capital Punishment

If there is no trial, who decides if they are guilty? The Home Secretary?
This is purely for those who have committed serious offences and no trial is required to prove or otherwise their guilt, if it takes the home secretary to authorise it then no longer than two weeks from arrest to death.
 
Who would decide and how?

Who would decide what ??and how well er common sense

Examples

2 blokes behead a soldier on the streets of London in broad day light ???

Some bloke crossed the road in broad day light and butchers labour MP Joe cox in broad day light

Some fruit cake butchers Tory MP David Amiss in his office

How would you decide there guilt ????

Those 4 would be bumped off ( smoking gun evidence)

How they are bumped off I don’t really care tbh

Left to me they would know pain / terror and fear before they are bumped off

Stuff there human rights as well
 
Who would decide what ??and how well er common sense

Examples

2 blokes behead a soldier on the streets of London in broad day light ???

Some bloke crossed the road in broad day light and butchers labour MP Joe cox in broad day light

Some fruit cake butchers Tory MP David Amiss in his office

How would you decide there guilt ????

Those 4 would be bumped off ( smoking gun evidence)

How they are bumped off I don’t really care tbh

Left to me they would know pain / terror and fear before they are bumped off

Stuff there human rights as well
what if the voices told them?
 
Like smashing a pop singer in the face with a rifle butt because you disgree with them - kind of beatings....

"....A disgusting cretin that thinks he is clever. I would happily smash him in his face with a rifle butt.....

Some intellect. :rolleyes:
Charge it !!!!!
 
Who would decide what ??and how well er common sense

Examples

2 blokes behead a soldier on the streets of London in broad day light ???

Some bloke crossed the road in broad day light and butchers labour MP Joe cox in broad day light

Some fruit cake butchers Tory MP David Amiss in his office

How would you decide there guilt ????

Those 4 would be bumped off ( smoking gun evidence)

How they are bumped off I don’t really care tbh

Left to me they would know pain / terror and fear before they are bumped off

Stuff there human rights as well

I'm just interested in the process you envisage. You seem to be saying that whenever somebody is found guilty of murder with 'smoking gun' evidence then the perpetrator should be executed. I am asking who would make the decision that the threshold for the evidence being sufficiently certain has been met. The most likely people would be the jury making an additional verdict on top of the normal verdict, the judge or the Home Secretary. There has never been such a system anywhere in the world, so I thought it would be interesting to discuss how it might work in practice.
 
I'm just interested in the process you envisage. You seem to be saying that whenever somebody is found guilty of murder with 'smoking gun' evidence then the perpetrator should be executed. I am asking who would make the decision that the threshold for the evidence being sufficiently certain has been met. The most likely people would be the jury making an additional verdict on top of the normal verdict, the judge or the Home Secretary. There has never been such a system anywhere in the world, so I thought it would be interesting to discuss how it might work in practice.
Have you any suggestions? I am keen to hear from you and MBK as the legal eagles how this could be implemented?
 
Back
Top