I'm just interested in the process you envisage. You seem to be saying that whenever somebody is found guilty of murder with 'smoking gun' evidence then the perpetrator should be executed. I am asking who would make the decision that the threshold for the evidence being sufficiently certain has been met. The most likely people would be the jury making an additional verdict on top of the normal verdict, the judge or the Home Secretary. There has never been such a system anywhere in the world, so I thought it would be interesting to discuss how it might work in practice.