Well let's see if we can unpick this. Hopefully without people trying to get me shut down because they fear reason prevailing.
Re the first part, who has/is arguing that? Who has said that a trans woman is a biological one?
Can you provide any examples?
As for the second part, that's the problem to be grappled with. Who, and to what extent, and in what circumstances, should a trans woman be treated as if they were a biological one?
It's far from a straightforward issue, but that doesn't mean that it should be dismissed as rubbish by people who cannot, or do not want to, deal with things which are not straightforward.
It's also multifaceted - for example it could easily be that a trans woman who is not a sex offender, or violent misogynist, could be allowed to use female toilets and yet not be allowed to compete in female boxing matches. But how do we ever build a framework for all the determinations to be made if the debate is hijacked by ignorant prejudice and ridicule?
Not sure what that means - "offering ... female only health and biological conditions ...". I'm not saying that to TTP, but because I'm going to make an assumption about what you meant, and I apologise if I got it wrong.
So I'm going to assume you meant offering "female only" health services to non biological women?
If so, do you have any examples? I can't see how, even with the most determined will in the world, a medical professional could perform a smear test on a trans woman. Breast cancer screening I guess is another one, but
a) men can and do get, and die from, breast cancer
b) do you know for sure that trans women who've undergone hormone treatment to promote breast growth haven't increased their risk of the disease?
As I said, apologies if I misunderstood, but apart from breast screening and gynecology I cant think of any medical services which are sex based and wouldn't work for trans women. Likewise prostate cancer screening in trans men - there'd be bggr all point in that.
Are you aware that trans women can breast feed?
If you don't want to call a trans woman a "woman", what do you want to call a trans woman who lactates if not a person who breast feeds?
Addressed at the start.
But to what extent is it a real issue, and not one which has been grossly exaggerated by the ignorant, the prejudiced, and the frothing swivel-eyed right wing media?
Importantly to what extent is it an issue which could not be properly, or more easily, dealt with in an environment not distorted by the shoutings of the ignorant, the prejudiced, and the frothing swivel-eyed right wing media?
Even if they could see what's between his legs?
And if one isn't available, like say your average gym or swimming pool?
