C
cantaloup63
What's all the rush anyway? Lower it to 60 and make public transport fast and comparable in price.
What's all the rush anyway?
It's not going to happen anyway because the government can't justify the extra loss of life or the extra 20% fuel wasted. Not only that, when people realise how much extra it would cost to travel at 80 rather than 70 they'll sit in the middle lane on 70.
Why not make lane 1 compulsory 58mph.
Lane 2 compulsory 70,
and lane 3 can be left for the idiots that will always do what they want anyway.
Use your brain martian. The impact at 80mph is much greater than at 70mph. Something to do with the square root rather than a linear scale.
But the main problem is that you'll have trucks doing 58 in the slow lane and cars doing 85 -90 in the middle lane. Can you see that there might be a problem there?
joe-90";p="2132099 said:The cause is the speed differential./quote]
driving at a different speed to someone else does not... and i emphasise... DOES NOT cause accidents!!!
It is the MAIN cause.
Imagine a motorway where all the vehicles travel at 70mph. Where will the crashes come from? It's differential that is the cause. Stop being silly and LEARN from the master.
But the main problem is that you'll have trucks doing 58 in the slow lane and cars doing 85 -90 in the middle lane. Can you see that there might be a problem there?
And what if they happen when changing lanes one travelling at 58 the other at 88? Gedditt yet?