Remind us again where the words in it came from?
Remind us again where the words in the version you read came from?
A religion history lesson needed
- Thread starter DIYedboy
- Start date
- Status
anyone predicting Jesus return or rapture,(the blessed hope) whith dates and times, we know they are fakes.
matthew 24:36
Jesus said,But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.”
...but you won't believe it even if he does come back.
king james version.
joseph smiths writings are in the book of mormans, not the king james version. the old king james been around since 1611, its was exactly translated from the original text.
joseph smith wrote his fake book,1830. he claimed its new revelation, and part of scripture, but we know the new testament was finished whith the apostles.
joseph smith was a false teacher, false apostle. his teachings are not inline whith original scripture.
https://www.gotquestions.org/Mormons.html
How do you know?
How do you know?
Perhaps, as I asked, they are an improvement that god thought of in the early 1800s.
What you don't seem to even realise, let alone accept, is that everything you believe is just what somebody wrote.
The things you disagree with are also what somebody wrote.
That you choose to believe one thing over another is your choice.
This is solely because you were born and raised in Britain (or somewhere similar) and that is what you were told and you believed it.
Had you been born elsewhere you would have been told and therefore believed something else.
Isn't it strange how people born in different parts of the world happen to believe different things?
Oh, I forgot, you don't even believe catholics so you are relying on Henry VIII. It's only the church of England that is correct.
That's Lucky, isn't it?
That's Lucky, isn't it?
https://www.bing.com/search?q=king+james+bible+translation+errors
Remind us what the people who wrote earlier books claimed?
Remind us why nothing can ever advance.
You are laughable, you really are.
its because you don't understand spiritual things concerning scripture, you think you do, but you don't, this is what the bible says
:1 Corinthians 2:14
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Here's a quote from another book:
“It is time we admitted, from kings and presidents on down, that there is no evidence that any of our books was authored by the Creator of the universe. The Bible, it seems certain, was the work of sand-strewn men and women who thought the earth was flat and for whom a wheelbarrow would have been a breathtaking example of emerging technology. To rely on such a document as the basis for our worldview-however heroic the efforts of redactors- is to repudiate two thousand years of civilizing insights that the human mind has only just begun to inscribe upon itself through secular politics and scientific culture. We will see that the greatest problem confronting civilization is not merely religious extremism: rather, it is the larger set of cultural and intellectual accommodations we have made to faith itself.”
― Sam Harris, The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason
“It is time we admitted, from kings and presidents on down, that there is no evidence that any of our books was authored by the Creator of the universe. The Bible, it seems certain, was the work of sand-strewn men and women who thought the earth was flat and for whom a wheelbarrow would have been a breathtaking example of emerging technology. To rely on such a document as the basis for our worldview-however heroic the efforts of redactors- is to repudiate two thousand years of civilizing insights that the human mind has only just begun to inscribe upon itself through secular politics and scientific culture. We will see that the greatest problem confronting civilization is not merely religious extremism: rather, it is the larger set of cultural and intellectual accommodations we have made to faith itself.”
― Sam Harris, The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason
Henry VIII was a Catholic.
No - the problem is that you do not understand what the book which you call The Bible is.
Ok. He fell out with the Roman part.
- Status
Similar threads
- Johnmelad502
- General Discussion
