youve not disproved what I statedFirst black female MP notch, not the first black MP.
The year she was elected there was 2 others at least. Paul Boateng and Bernie Grant for example
youve not disproved what I statedFirst black female MP notch, not the first black MP.
The year she was elected there was 2 others at least. Paul Boateng and Bernie Grant for example
It's the other way around, actually.At least he bothers to check if what he is designing can be built.
hows that Rwanda scheme coming alongAt least he bothers to check if what he is designing can be built.
a tax adviser says:
Tax adviser Mr McCann said: "I don't think there's any credible case to be made that she's deliberately evaded tax. I don't see that as likely.
"Worst case scenario is that she didn't realise it. She wasn't Angela Rayner, deputy leader of the Labour Party, she was a care worker. These rules are very complicated."
He points out that mistakes can be remedied with HMRC within four years so it's now out of time - although she could choose to pay money back if found to owe anything.
oh dear, gasbag says its not out of time, tax advisor says it is
Angela Rayner's tax affairs - a smear or a real trust problem for Labour?
Labour's deputy leader has branded the story a "stream of smears", but the Conservatives will be keeping the pressure on to reveal more details, and Labour will have to decide whether to bow to that pressure.news.sky.com
Are you saying she deliberately evaded tax liabilities?Its not true.
Not what I asked.I'm saying she was an MP when she had the obligation to pay the tax.
You are not actually saying anything. Certainly not to dispute what the specialist tax adviser said.I'm saying she was an MP when she had the obligation to pay the tax.
My view of if it was deliberate or not is irrelevant, her story doesn't stack up. I personally think it was an oversight/misunderstanding.
Few people consider the financial/tax consequences of getting married - me included
She sold her house in March 2015
She became an MP in May 2015.
Her Liability to pay capital gains on the property was while she was an MP.
Its not true.
She sold her house in March 2015
She became an MP in May 2015.
Her Liability to pay capital gains on the property was while she was an MP.
and to correct the above:
HMRC investigation time limit is 4 years if an innocent error is suspected; where mistakes in tax returns are deemed careless or negligent, the window extends to 6 years. Suspicion of deliberate tax evasion warrants an investigation period of 20 years. and of course there is no statute of limitation on criminal prosecutions.
Notchy 0 gassy 1.
It’s out of time for her to pay the tax, not for HMRC to come after her.
And you saidoversight/misunderstanding
time limit is 4 years if an innocent error is suspected
careless or negligent
Standard CGT yes, but CGT derived from the disposal of property is due within 60 days. I suspect she wasn't subject to self assessment at the time, not that its relevant.I don't know much about capital gains tax. So can you just clarify the process for me.
The tax liability is for the 2014-2015 tax year? And does that then go on the tax return, which has to be done by January 2016. What questions are on that form which might be relevant to her. Does it, for instance, ask whether you have sold a property and if so was it your main residence.
notchy joins carman in the hard of thinking club.You are contradicting yourself
You said
And you said
An oversight / misunderstanding is an innocent error
It is not:
Notchie 8 nil