it is about context and equivalence.Doesn't make the term any less racist.
is that a bit too nuanced for you?
it is about context and equivalence.Doesn't make the term any less racist.
it is about context and equivalence.
is that a bit too nuanced for you?
the word "nuanced" is not a logical fallacy.There we go - keep 'em coming.
we have all lead a sheltered life as in our level off knowledge is only as good as what we learn ??And how on Earth do you tell the difference?.. You must have had a sheltered life not knowing P,,I was offensive!!!Anybody could use that defence.
the word "nuanced" is not a logical fallacy.
years ago when worked on the railway as a driver [about early eighties then] i used the term packies not realizing it was in any way derogatory indeed if i knew it was in the least negative i would be horrified as i dont do negative to any great extent never mind in an evil way ??
any way the people concerned understood i had zero negative intent so was taken in the way ment as it should be
in that respect i was Nieve and wrongly informed so iff your intentions are to be offensive or possibly evil your words are wrong and need correcting including a penalty or punishment
iff you intentions are misguided with no ill intent or upset meant then no penality should be applied if a correct heart felt genuine apology is given when you realise it can be wrong and upsetting even if it takes several times till you remember
any way the point i am making if your "free speech "is being offensive or possibly evil it deserves being rained in with a heavy hand
if it is nieve or well ment a lighter hand should be used

Aren't we all!i am still learning ??

I suspect the majority of the white population were raised in such circumstances.I was brought up in a white racist culture, with subtle and not-so-subtle messages all around to see people different than myself as stupid, bad, dangerous, dirty, other - how could I not be racist?
I suspect the majority of the white population were raised in such circumstances.
I assume it was education and the inculcation of an enquiring mind that caused you to re-appraise, thanks to enlightened teachers.

Thanks for sharing that with us, sxturbo.no i was raised to treat everyone regardless of skin colour equal.
i went to a public school where there were many different nationalities and not once did anyone abuse someone for the colour of their skin. there were many things people were bullied for skin colour was one of them, no one was called pak i, or gollywogg, insert any other racial slur.
the reason for this is we were brought up to be equal, there was none of this divide of colours.
i was on a business trip earlier int he year and my client was a black guy, he brought his 2 customers with him whom were both white, we were awaiting the arrival of a frequency vibration specialist and when he arrived i went to greet him (the specialist), after greeting him i said "i need to nip the the loo, go and see Patrick and he'll feel you in" the response i got was who's Patrick, i said the one in the purple shirt (as i didnt want to cause offence, it is drummed into us to make no distinction of skin colour), the specialist looked at me and said the black bloke then, my response was me saying i was trying to not be racist, though in fact in trying not to recognise his skin colour could also be seen a racist.
so this is where we are, we dont know what the right term is any more, should i have described him as "the black bloke"?
You seem to be contradicting yourself.i went to a public school where there were many different nationalities and not once did anyone abuse someone for the colour of their skin. there were many things people were bullied for skin colour was one of them,
Can you name the country to the west of India without using what you call a racial slur?no one was called pak i, or gollywogg, insert any other racial slur.
If it were the other way round, would you have worried about describing the person as 'the white bloke'?so this is where we are, we dont know what the right term is any more, should i have described him as "the black bloke"?
If you are 10 maybewas in such common usage that it would be so easy not to realise its racist connotations.
Whichever you preferperhaps "unworldly" [if thats a word]or ill informed may be better description ??
in some respects i am still a bit "Naïve"as i am still learning ??
PakistanCan you name the country to the west of India without using what you call a racial slur?
They donot live in P..I.If in fact they actually do, they must be the only people in the world who think the name of their country is a racial slur - not that they are a separate race, of course.