WRONG
Climate Change
- Thread starter Highway Man
- Start date
WRONG
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
link is third one down
Authors of peer reviewed scientific papers on climate change here, it's a .xlsx download.
Can not read an xlsxllxssxl
Just copy and paste the bit that says there are hundreds and thousands of climate scientists
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 317777
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Well I knew I'd get some excuse but that?
Research papers tend to publish data sets, it's how they do it. It's not my problem if you can't access it.
He is trying to prove that he did not make it up when he said there were hundreds and thousands of climate scientists.
Is that what the xlslllxxsllx says
Its this:
"Initial Data With Random Order Added.xlsx
A full set of the original data used with a random number added to randomise order."
So it looks like a list of the authors of the climate studies, that are being stuidied. The authors are there to be a reference for each study.
Title at the top says:
Supplementary data for: Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature
And the 3000 taken from teh long list is random.
So out of the over 88000 studies (nearly all have more than one author), 99% come to the same conclusion, that human caused climate change is a thing.
Hope this helps.
It sounds like a spreadsheet. I haven't looked at it. There should be a way to open it even if you don't have Excel. I often find them very confusing, though.
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 4,509
- Reaction score
- 1,707
- Country
there is hundreds of thousands of scientists in the world and something way in excess of 99% of them think it is happening and it is directly related to the burning of fossil fuels, in fact anyone with a half reasonable IQ thinks its happening and its man made
it is not really worth debating
But what is worth talking about is what we should do, quite reasonable to say I couldn't care less, or bring it on I want a better sun tan
Or could failing harvests in other densely populated countries such as Bangladesh cause a migration catastrophe ? could many of them come here.
how would our food security fair - we are only capable of meeting about meeting 45% of our calorific needs, if harvests start failing in badly affected parts of the world what would happen here?
it is not really worth debating
But what is worth talking about is what we should do, quite reasonable to say I couldn't care less, or bring it on I want a better sun tan
Or could failing harvests in other densely populated countries such as Bangladesh cause a migration catastrophe ? could many of them come here.
how would our food security fair - we are only capable of meeting about meeting 45% of our calorific needs, if harvests start failing in badly affected parts of the world what would happen here?
The debate is proof of hundreds of thousands of climate scientists - denso's claim
D
Deleted member 317777
D
Deleted member 317777
And his XL document has made him look likes he’s telling pork pies, again.
He must have a link ? A proper link
There is also a 167mb spreadsheet that opens without Excel on my tablet, listing not just the authors, but the summaries of each study, and data associated with the meta study in question among other things. It is a huge data set, including studies into solar influences etc.
Egs:. The results of analysis of variations in the total solar irradiance in the 17-24th solar activity cycles and their relation to the climate global warming are presented. The influence of galactic cosmic rays and volcanic activity on the climate is considered. It is shown that the Earth's temperature varied in the 17-20th cycles according to the behavior of solar activity without any observed trend: the temperature increased with an increase in solar activity and decreased in solar minima. Global warming began in 1976 in the 21st solar activity cycle. In light of the observed trend, the changes in the Earth's global temperature in the 21-24th solar activity cycles were related to the cyclical variation of the total solar irradiance in the same way as in the 17-20th cycles. By changing the atmospheric transparency on the background of reductions of the total solar irradiance, galactic cosmic rays also contributed to the increase in the temperature minima. Strong volcanic eruptions were accompanied by 1- to 2-year annual decreases in the temperature, which did not disturb the cyclical process of changes in the Earth's climate. In the absence of trends in the cosmophysical factors influencing the climate, the process of the gradual increase in the global mean temperature of the Earth in the 21-24th solar activity cycles is explained by the anthropogenic factor.
Based on available published paleodata, cosmophysical environment of the Earth during the Cambrian evolutionary explosion is considered. Some astrophysical data demonstrate that, about 500 Ma, the Sun entered into the Perseus arm with the enhanced density of star population and spent there several dozen million years. According to some meteorite data, the average level of the galactic cosmic ray (GCR) intensity during that period was considerably higher than previously, when the Sun passed the space between the galactic arms. The GCR flux varied from 25 to 135%, as the Solar System consequently crossed other galactic arms. Some correlation of the GCR intensity variations with periods of global warming and cooling has been found. However, there was no unambiguous relation between climatic data and the GCR intensity. Unfortunately, an accuracy of estimation of the GCR intensity through meteorite data varies to within 0.30-1.5, which does not allow making definite conclusions. For more reliable conclusions, additional astrophysical data obtaining is needed, and new approaches to modeling of the GCR propagation, which take into account their characteristic lifetime of 10-100 Ma, should be applied. A possibility of impact of Supernova outbursts and superincreases of solar cosmic ray (SCR) flux on climatic changes are discussed. A possible bioeffective role of the geomagnetic field reversals, oscillations of the position of the Sun in the Galaxy, and other unidentified yet factors is also considered.
Natural climate change currently acts in concert with human-induced changes in the climate system. To disentangle the natural variability in the climate system and the human-induced effects on the global climate, a critical analysis of climate change in the past may offer a better understanding of the processes that drive the global climate system. In this review paper, we present palaeoclimatological evidence for the past influence of solar variability on Earth's climate, highlighting the effects of solar forcing on a range of timescales. On a decadal timescale, instrumental measurements as well as historical records show the effects of the 11-year Schwabe cycle on climate. The variation in total solar irradiance that is associated with a Schwabe cycle is only similar to 1 W m(-2) between a solar minimum and a maximum, but winter and spring temperatures on the Northern Hemisphere show a response even to this small-scale variability. There is a large body of evidence from palaeoclimatic reconstructions that shows the influence of solar activity on a centennial to millennial timescale. We highlight a period of low solar activity starting at 2800 years before present when Europe experienced a shift to colder and wetter climate conditions. The spatial pattern of climate change that can be recognized in the palaeoclimatological data is in line with the suggested pattern of climate change as simulated by climate models. Millennial-scale climate oscillations can be recognized in sediment records from the Atlantic Ocean as well as in records of lake-level fluctuations in southeastern France. These oscillations coincide with variation in C-14 production as recognized in the atmospheric C-14 record (which is a proxy-record for solar activity), suggesting that Earth's climate is sensitive to changes in solar activity on a millennial timescale as well.
Numerous empirical studies have analyzed International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project data and reached contradictory conclusions regarding the influence of solar-modulated galactic cosmic rays on cloud fraction and cloud properties. The Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) instrument on the Terra satellite has been in continuous operation for 13years and thus provides an independent (and previously unutilized) cloud data set to investigate purported solar-cloud links. Furthermore, unlike many previous solar-climate studies that report cloud fraction MISR measures albedo, which has clearer climatological relevance. Our long-term analysis of MISR data finds no statistically significant correlations between cosmic rays and global albedo or globally averaged cloud height, and no evidence for any regional or lagged correlations. Moreover, epoch superposition analysis of Forbush decreases reveals no detectable albedo response to cosmic ray decreases, thereby placing an upper limit on the possible influence of cosmic ray variations on global albedo of 0.0029 per 5% decrease. The implications for recent global warming are discussed.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
I even linked you to their names. I really don't know what else you want.
