But surely it should have risen between 1880 and 1915 not dropped right in the middle of that industrial revolution as it had been rising before then .
Or was it just natural
You appear not to have read my post!

But surely it should have risen between 1880 and 1915 not dropped right in the middle of that industrial revolution as it had been rising before then .
Or was it just natural
what overall change ? over the past 4 years the past 50 years or the past 12000 yearsWind change
It’s a blip, not evidence of a change
The overall trend is one of substantial ice loss on the continent
oh here comes warren taking time out from making his millionsGasser as before, is just posting splinters of contrived "facts" of no significance, and shows ignorance of much of the research which has been done.
Look it up for yourself.
If you just repeatedly trot out the same uninformed crap on a forum and expect others to put you right, and complain when they CBA, you're a worthless troll.
none answer. attempt to dissect his facts and figuresThe latest research is conclusive. The science has been settled on this for years now.

Again, run along and look it up for yourself. It's not difficult, even a lead basher can understand. They might have to top up their basic edumification, though, rather than sneer at what they don't understand.what overall change ? over the past 4 years the past 50 years or the past 12000 years

What are you talking about ?you mean like present were hundreds of billions of tons of ice have been added to the antarctic ice shelves the past few years
Gasser as before, is just posting splinters of contrived "facts" of no significance, and shows ignorance of much of the research which has been done.
Over the period the ice sheet grewwhat overall change ? over the past 4 years the past 50 years or the past 12000 years
It’s the MO of conspiracy theorists…..post a stream of myths to avoid having the truth catch up.I can't work out whether he is trolling or whether he really doesn't understand. But either way, I am bored of it now.

Nothing to dissect. The science is settled, you've missed the boat.none answer. attempt to dissect his facts and figures
Electric cars weren't the way forward, We need to be careful when listening to the so called experts, take Beeching for example, in the sixties he was responsible for the removal of over 4000 miles & about 2500 stations of our train network.Climate alarmist are so batshit crazy that at the same time as saying we should all be driving electric cars they are slashing the tyres of tesla’s electric cars because they dont like the bloke who makes them.![]()
Electric cars weren't the way forward, We need to be careful when listening to the so called experts, take Beeching for example, in the sixties he was responsible for the removal of over 4000 miles & about 2500 stations of our train network.
His thinking behind this was it would be better if we all had our own metal box to drive round in! The pollution from this decision must be astronomical.

Quite the opposite over the past 25 million years the planet has alternated between glacial–interglacial periods. If it were not for our green house gas contribution the planet would be slowly cooling, possibly heading towards another ice age in a 100,000 years timeMaybe it would all be happening without us anyway...who knows

But we cant take humans away to see for real what would of happened/be happening, so I'll stick to my scientific codswallop answer.Quite the opposite over the past 25 million years the planet has alternated between glacial–interglacial periods. If it were not for our green house gas contribution the planet would be slowly cooling, possibly heading towards another ice age in a 100,000 years time
As we all know the planet has warmer and cooler periods, but these generally take several hundred thousand years to come and go - what we are achieving with our complete and utter bolluxs is happening in decades - that is why there is nothing natural about it at all