No - that is something you are incorrectly inferring, not something he is implying,But the implication of bernards statements imply he is "quoting" from an official document or reg.
No - that is something you are incorrectly inferring, not something he is implying,But the implication of bernards statements imply he is "quoting" from an official document or reg.
Oh my god, how will I ever recover from a statement that the whole english speaking world can understand, but BAS can't.No - that is something you are incorrectly inferring, not something he is implying,
What about the CPC in 1.5mm² T&E?I would advise 1.5mm because I think 1.0 cable lacks mechanical strength. But I would not try to imply that this was some kind of reg or official requirement.
As already pointed out by others I am not quoting from any document. What I am "quoting" from is more than 40 years experience of life. That experience unfortunately includes awareness of incidents that involved serious injury or death even though there was total compliance with the regulations in force at the time. Those injuries and deaths occured because the people who had compiled the regulations had not forseen the type of incident as being possible so did not include preventive measures in the regulations. The regulations were often ammended to prevent a similar incident happening. I am also aware of many situations where people have used common sense and/or experience and ignored or even acted contrary to the regulations and in doing so have improved safety at that particular location.But the implication of bernards statements imply he is "quoting" from an official document or reg. He is not, he is expressing a personal opinion,
It's not the whole world, as it clearly does not include you.Oh my god, how will I ever recover from a statement that the whole english speaking world can understand, but BAS can't.
It's not the whole world, as it clearly does not include you.
If a conclusion is said to follow from something a person has written, then it can matter hugely whether the writer is responsible for the conclusion because he implied it, or whether the reader is responsible because he inferred it.
As in this case. You are claiming that because of what Bernard wrote there must be a regulation or other "official" guidance. But that is absolutely not what Bernard was implying, it is what you chose to infer.
If you don't understand the difference then you should not be using the words, and if you think that it is acceptable to blame someone else for something which is your fault then you have no business being here.
As an example, if I was asked what size cable should be used for domestic lighting, I would advise 1.5mm because I think 1.0 cable lacks mechanical strength..
It does not need mechanical strength.
What are you talking about.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local