GHIC card.

It’s the running, operation, unfairness, waste, fraud, dictatorial manner and bureaucracy of the EU I’m against, not the EU countries themselves, some of which are actually worth travelling to.
So, you're not against the way the EU was deliberately structured to asset strip and destroy the UK when we were members? You're not against the way the EU filtered out those migrants that would always be a drain on their host state, and directed them to the UK? You're not against the FACT that the EU is an agency of the German state, founded purely to progress German domination over Europe? I could go on, but I will not.

The other countries you mention are not a fair comparison. Many people support those countries and their regimes, and are within their rights to do so. WIth the EU, we had a referendum in 2016 and LEAVE overwhlemingly won. The British people voted to sever all ties. If you are still tying yourself to the EU - and you cannot cherrypick "countries" and hope that hides the position - you are directly acting against the democratically expressed wish, now enshrined in law and reinforced by the meteoric rise of Restore and Reform, of the British people.
 
So, you're not against the way the EU was deliberately structured to asset strip and destroy the UK when we were members? You're not against the way the EU filtered out those migrants that would always be a drain on their host state, and directed them to the UK? You're not against the FACT that the EU is an agency of the German state, founded purely to progress German domination over Europe?
Eh? I’m against all that and more. Isn’t that obvious from my posts? Doesn’t mean I shouldn’t go there or eat or use any products that come from there.
 
So, you're not against the way the EU was deliberately structured to asset strip and destroy the UK when we were members?
Lets start with your first lie:
We were members for nearly five decades. What took them so long? Also, explain why economists state, and why the UK economy is now worse off since leaving?

He won’t answer.
He can’t answer.
 
Surely, if you become ill/accident etc, near to the time limited 90 days, and there is a likelihood of you going over your allowed 90 days, the travel insurance would be obliged to repatriate you.
If you are a dual national, and a national of the country, the 90 days limit would not apply, surely?
Actually what I was saying was that UK citizens are limited to 90 days out of a rolling 180 days in the EU/EEA, and thus the card has less use than it did before brexit...

And as for dual nationals, insurance companies no longer have the obligation to repatriate to the UK because it can be argued that the dual national is already in their 'own country' regardless of country of residence...

And that duality issue can be seen right now by the number of UK citizens being refused entry back into the UK because they don't have the paperwork/documents they didn't need prior to brexit!
 
Unlike you, I don’t need coverage for those countries that don’t have the balls to be full EU members such as Iceland and as for "time limited", how long did your blessed EHIC last when it was freely availible?
As always it's you, you, you...

Guess what, other people have different ambitions but of course as you have said time and time again - you don't care about others!

And how long did that EHIC card last?

From the issue date to expiry date, without any gaps in coverage, and freely renewable...

Feel free to tell us how the situation now is better than before...

Without the one trick usual silly reply ;)
 
And how long did that EHIC card last?

From the issue date to expiry date, without any gaps in coverage, and freely renewable...
We're getting there. So, how long after the issue date was the expiry date? Come on, just answer. No swerving.
 
Lets start with your first lie:
We were members for nearly five decades. What took them so long? Also, explain why economists state, and why the UK economy is now worse off since leaving?

He won’t answer.
He can’t answer.
I can answer and I will answer.

Mottie has already adequately picked up on the "what took them so long" point, although I'll add that the EU was formed in 1993, meaning that we were members for about 27 years (depending on how you count the date of exit), roughly half of your 5 decades claim.

The "economists" you refer to are academics and likely paid shills of the EU or the global elite. They do not represent the real economy - they are paid to create a model that demonstrates a desired outcome.

If you ask Britons to relay their lived experiences post our exit from the EU, the overwhleming majority will indicate substantial financial and cultural improvements, as well as a higher degree of engagement in the direction of thsi country, since leaving the beast. This is where the truth lies, not in some "economist" spouting what they have been told to say.
 
The wait goes on...
There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. I have set out a comprehensive reply to your (loaded) questions above.

I am not prepared to play pointless games. If my answers do not suffice, the issue lies with you and I wish you every success in your efforts to improve your understanding.

However, those improvenents will not arise from you tying me up in your circuitous, to no avail, word salad.

Over and out.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top