I don't understand. EU: "We have a deal".

[durhamplumber]

Finally you get it. One baby step at a time.

Lol

 

[EFLImpudence]

You lot are a joke.Thinking anyone needs to prove anything to you.

Why do you post anything, then?

 

[durhamplumber]

Why do you post anything, then?

Certainly not to prove anything to you!...

 

[transam]

Same bunch scream that Parliament is stalling Brexit but would scream to high heaven if there were not checks and balances in place if it were the opposition in power.

No. I. Would not

Checks and balances? is that what they are calling it now

A new phrase for remoaners checks and balances

 

[fillyboy]

So the Uk acted under its own prerogative.
Finally you get it. One baby step at a time.

No, the UK signed up to a treaty, Maastrict, article 126 of which 'obliges' member states to avoid excessive budgetary deficits. The annexe to the treaty defines two criteria and reference values which from memory is 3% of gdp for deficit and 60% of gdp for debt.

Come up with whatever nonsense you want Galahad, it's all in the Maastricht treaty in black and white for all to read, it's not nonsense on twitter or rubbish from a leftwing head banger on a diy forum, it's written into a treaty to which the UK is a signatory.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Certainly not to prove anything to you!...

Just pointless time wasting, then.

Johnson to revoke Article 50 on Monday.

 

[SirGalahad]

No, the UK signed up to a treaty, Maastrict, article 126 of which 'obliges' member states to avoid excessive budgetary deficits. The annexe to the treaty defines two criteria and reference values which from memory is 3% of gdp for deficit and 60% of gdp for debt.

Come up with whatever nonsense you want Galahad, it's all in the Maastricht treaty in black and white for all to read, it's not nonsense on twitter or rubbish from a leftwing head banger on a diy forum, it's written into a treaty to which the UK is a signatory.

Your just clueless. So you cannot point out where it affected UK policy and you missed the 2005 reform and MTOs for each country but we have had this debate before and you parrot the same boring rubbish. Really hard to believe when someone who has no background in basic economics somehow thinks they know what they are talking about.

 

[transam]

aha he's a financial. Adviser

 

[durhamplumber]

Just pointless time wasting, then.

Johnson to revoke Article 50 on Monday.

Lol...debate...not proving anything.

 

[fillyboy]

Your just clueless. So you cannot point out where it affected UK policy and you missed the 2005 reform and MTOs for each country but we have had this debate before and you parrot the same boring rubbish. Really hard to believe when someone who has no background in basic economics somehow thinks they know what they are talking about.

Are you saying it's not in the Maastricht Treaty? I've already been down that road with Notch. As for pointing out where it affected UK policy, I did, I pointed out the Maastricht Treaty which the UK agreed to and signed, are you saying we didn't?

Like Notch, you're big on insults but extremely short on facts.

 

[durhamplumber]

Your just clueless. So you cannot point out where it affected UK policy and you missed the 2005 reform and MTOs for each country but we have had this debate before and you parrot the same boring rubbish. Really hard to believe when someone who has no background in basic economics somehow thinks they know what they are talking about.

No worse than you thinking you know everything

 

[durhamplumber]

Like Notch, you're big on insults but extremely short on facts.

Good point.v v well made.

 

[fillyboy]

aha he's a financial. Adviser

with three degrees.

 

[durhamplumber]

with three degrees.

And a serious attitude problem.

 

[durhamplumber]

Just pointless time wasting, then

More arrogance and nonsense from remoaners.