Investment

I’ve been buying VWRP since April this year. Avg buy price is £127. I bought some more yesterday. And some a few days ago. Which dragged my avg up.

With this and other investments. I’m evenly split between pension, stock, cash and property. I ignore toys and vehicles etc on the spreadsheet at least.

I use Apple numbers to track as it has formula for stock tickers and exchange rates. So it automatically updates.
 
Only by the people who construct false stories founded in prejudice

And aren't willing to make a donation to RDA.
Seems folk are quick to mention another’s past failures or losses, but give pointless speeches about dredging up the past, when they mention their gains.
Two tier for sure.
 
Anybody can also make a remark, that is an observation and not advice.

Only a fool invents or repeats some false story in an attempt to denigrate people he doesn't like,
 
So do I stop with America or go Asian??
It depends on your growth goals and risk appetite.

For example 8-10% growth on a well diversified lower risk portfolio can be great, while it would be poor on a high tech/AI loaded portfolio where the risks are higher.

Work out what you want to achieve and take no more risk than is necessary. Also consider the tax liability for now and in the future. If your portfolio is Inside an ISA or SIPP, then be careful about managing the dividends to avoid being taxed. If its outside an ISA, then check you understand your deemed earnings, even if you think you haven't had any.

if you'd have put money in AAXJ vs say QQQ (NASDQ Tech) or VWRP, you'd have missed 50% and 30% growth in the last 5 years. But it might still have been a good strategy as part of a balanced portfolio.
 
... If your portfolio is Inside an ISA or SIPP, then be careful about managing the dividends to avoid being taxed....

Eh?
Dividends are tax free in a SIPP or ISA.

Except for US shares, which will suffer 15% withholding tax before it is sent.

There is also a German Dividend Tax, if you hold German shares (less common).

There may be other countries but the amateur investor usually avoids direct shareholdings, especially foreign ones.
 
I missed that in Healey's budget, I spotted the cancelling of the reduction of the allowance, but didn't see that he'd also cancelled the tax on S&S ISA left over cash.
 
Not to you, apparently - #480.(y)
You're mistaken. #480 doesn't discuss the sources of HMG's funds.


So do I stop with America or go Asian??
They can overlap a fair bit these years, especially in terms of volatility. Taiwan and Korea in paticular are major suppliers of processors and memory chips respectively, so when the AI knob gets adjusted their stocks fly about with the US ones.
The mid-term elections in the US have made a fair difference because Democrats don't like AI, apparently.

I'm not really looking for growth, so I'll avoid being invested much in AI.
There's a vast amount of money flowing around between the AI companies and their suppliers. It's referred to as "circular". They're starting to fund their spending from debt now not their profits. It's reckoned some of the big ones will fail. "Experts" occupy themselves with drawing parallels with the various bubbles and crashes we've seen before.
Not many are convinced that there is enough profit in AI for companies to pay vast amounts of money for it.
The Chinese produce much cheaper versions - partly by copying.
So there are some unreliable pillars holding the edifice up, I think.

I keep putting it off, but for my purposes, boring stuff is more appropriate. I've clung on to small amounts of some high tech stocks and some of them have crashed.
History shows you can come out OK if you hold through the dips, but that has the risk of inconvenience if you can't wait the months or years for the recovery. If you're in your 30's of 40's you have time, not so much if you're retired.

That sort of age-related argument has always been sage, but particularly so now because there IS an apparent bubble. It's a bit LESS appropriate than it used to be because you can be more nimble with your placing of investments, but that takes time and effort, and isn't easy.

For my purposes, very low risk stuff picked to avoid the highest taxes, will do. For medium term holdings, it's possible to do some picking of sectors, (such as renewable energy because Democrats like it and it's not too AI related,) and "swing" trade it, watching the momentum. Or say the UK, because we're too primitive to have much of anything AI.

Derek's funds are highly concentrated in high tech. The Asia Pacific fund is 70% Taiwan and S. Korea.
That means dominated by just three companies - Taiwan Semiconductor is the worlds biggest processor chip maker, Samsung and SK Hynix make memory chips.
Samsung and SK Hynix have dropped 30+% in the last couple of months, and Taiwan semi 20%.
I daresay they might go back up, eventually, but could also drop a lot further.
A lot of other companies which are part of the AI infrastructure have dipped too, such as Dell, which makes a lot of the racks, is down 35%.

That list of 10 companies above, has just one, Lilly (Pharma) which isn't heavily affected by AI. They vary, Apple is less.

Sobering?

Dividend paying companies tend to be Financials, Utilities are only connected through power supply, Healthcare is separate, and so on.
 
You're mistaken. #480 doesn't discuss the sources of HMG's funds.



They can overlap a fair bit these years, especially in terms of volatility. Taiwan and Korea in paticular are major suppliers of processors and memory chips respectively, so when the AI knob gets adjusted their stocks fly about with the US ones.
The mid-term elections in the US have made a fair difference because Democrats don't like AI, apparently.

I'm not really looking for growth, so I'll avoid being invested much in AI.
There's a vast amount of money flowing around between the AI companies and their suppliers. It's referred to as "circular". They're starting to fund their spending from debt now not their profits. It's reckoned some of the big ones will fail. "Experts" occupy themselves with drawing parallels with the various bubbles and crashes we've seen before.
Not many are convinced that there is enough profit in AI for companies to pay vast amounts of money for it.
The Chinese produce much cheaper versions - partly by copying.
So there are some unreliable pillars holding the edifice up, I think.

I keep putting it off, but for my purposes, boring stuff is more appropriate. I've clung on to small amounts of some high tech stocks and some of them have crashed.
History shows you can come out OK if you hold through the dips, but that has the risk of inconvenience if you can't wait the months or years for the recovery. If you're in your 30's of 40's you have time, not so much if you're retired.

That sort of age-related argument has always been sage, but particularly so now because there IS an apparent bubble. It's a bit LESS appropriate than it used to be because you can be more nimble with your placing of investments, but that takes time and effort, and isn't easy.

For my purposes, very low risk stuff picked to avoid the highest taxes, will do. For medium term holdings, it's possible to do some picking of sectors, (such as renewable energy because Democrats like it and it's not too AI related,) and "swing" trade it, watching the momentum. Or say the UK, because we're too primitive to have much of anything AI.

Derek's funds are highly concentrated in high tech. The Asia Pacific fund is 70% Taiwan and S. Korea.
That means dominated by just three companies - Taiwan Semiconductor is the worlds biggest processor chip maker, Samsung and SK Hynix make memory chips.
Samsung and SK Hynix have dropped 30+% in the last couple of months, and Taiwan semi 20%.
I daresay they might go back up, eventually, but could also drop a lot further.
A lot of other companies which are part of the AI infrastructure have dipped too, such as Dell, which makes a lot of the racks, is down 35%.

That list of 10 companies above, has just one, Lilly (Pharma) which isn't heavily affected by AI. They vary, Apple is less.

Sobering?

Dividend paying companies tend to be Financials, Utilities are only connected through power supply, Healthcare is separate, and so on.
AI is disrupting other tech stocks irrespective of the profitability of the business model. Start up software companies are dying at a higher rate, because their IP can be replicated by AI for a fraction of the cost.
The AI companies are global, they will build their DCs where governments allow. The democrats wont be able to put the brakes on AI unless they want to lose being the global leader.
 
not solely but certainly based on its recommendations as part of my restructuring to reduce tax.

It did make a mistake however on the tax treatment.
 
Back
Top