V
vinty
If he really believed that he hadn't done anything wrong why did he give up terrorismIf he truly believed in what he was doing, were they crimes or victims in his eyes?
If not, he would logically believe he had nothing to apologise or show remorse for?
He didn't want an independent Northern Ireland, he wanted a United Ireland even though a majority in Northern Ireland opposed it.He wanted independance for Northern Ireland and he achieved this through violence. Surely no worse than what her majesty inflicted on the peoples of Northern Ireland in a bid to make them submit. People die in conflict, this is life. You don't get anywhere waving banners and protesting the terms of your own enslavement, you take it into your own hands. I don't have a particular horse in the race but I identify with a man who doesn't want to be enslaved. You could say Hitler was trying to achieve the same thing, to escape from the IMF and the privately owned banking cartels, he failed but he went down trying. Look at Germany now and the rest of Europe.
Personally I think there are two sides to any conflict in 99.999999% of cases.
And before anyone jumps on me for defending the man, don't. I won't be.
The IRA's demands from the beginning of the troubles were quite straightforward, they wanted a British withdrawal and the Unification of North and South because they couldn't achieve this aim though the ballot box they turned to terrorism.
All the IRA's campaign achieved was to wreck the economy and spark a loyalist backlash against Catholics.
Their core demand of a United Ireland has not been achieved, any gains which they have made could have been achieved without the loss of a single life that is the tragedy.
