Is that necessary if we simply say that anything approved by the EMA is good enough for us?
Let's NOT give £350m extra each week to the NHS! A better idea....
- Thread starter JohnD
- Start date
Sponsored Links
So you'd be happy just doing what the EU tells us to do with no input?
Seriously though, we would at least need a Marketing Authorisations dept, and the EU could impose inspections etc. for any imports. The latter could work both ways of course.
We would need to maintain an equivalence of standards - we follow what the EMA dictate, to maintain trade with the EU.
"Pharmacovigilance" will have to be duplicated.
http://ec.europa.eu/health/human-use/pharmacovigilance_en
R&D funding will be lost in the UK as well to a large extent.
I could go on.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 63160
You do mate, you do.
I apologise if you find reality tedious.
Sponsored Links
Stop pointing out all the bad bits about Brexit Wobs, M itch finds it awfully tedious.
Entertain him with some good bits about Brexit.
Anything?
Entertain him with some good bits about Brexit.
Anything?
I'm sure Brexiteers will get a nice warm glowy feeling as we go through Brexit. There.
And we could come up with some better EWC codes for waste, as the current ones are rubbish. [sarcasm]I'm sure it will totally be worth it[/sarcasm]
Well I must say I'm a bit sorry for you. Being a tax-dodger means your pension isn't as good as it should be, and I see the world price of gold has dropped 25% in the last five years. You would have done better putting cash under the mattress.
I see my middling pension fund went up by 80% in the same period.
Similar threads
- Locked
