Respected Sources Of Information ?

Joined
22 Dec 2021
Messages
2,416
Reaction score
340
Country
United Kingdom
The Nordstream pipeline was sabotaged.

Who do you think did it???

Whether it was US or THEM basically boils down to that which you perceive.

So, who do you think did it???
 
The article you link doesn’t indicate that.

dishonest post
the link proves the plans to blow it up have been there for years .
The question asked was who do we think was responsible which i gave my opinion so what bit is dishonest
 
The British government probably did it. Everything else it does is self-destructive.
 
The first line from the article states: "Ruling out sabotage..." and goes on to say; "since many countries use UUVs..."

Respected sources of information do not include random assumptions by the Lord of Dork or his minions.

Although i'm amused to see an advert on the webpage from Denso telling me "to get ready for the impossible" so who knows - perhaps he will enlighten us?
 
Plenty of articles out there saying truss sent a message straight afterwards to blinken saying its done .Now she isnt the sharpest tool in the box which makes it sound believable and not the first time her communications have been hacked .
So one can make their own mind up .
Also russia has not tried to make much propaganda out of it so if they did do it to disrupt gas supplies far easier to just fake an explosion at the land based facilities which in time would be far easier to repair
 
Plenty of articles out there saying truss sent a message straight afterwards to blinken saying its done
How did the text conversation go, that preceded that text?

"I've put your Greggs sausage roll in for one minute..."

The gullible and the weak minded, lol. :rolleyes:
 
How did the text conversation go, that preceded that text?

"I've put your Greggs sausage roll in for one minute..."

The gullible and the weak minded, lol. :rolleyes:
what bit of you can make your own mind up are you struggling with , did i say its been proven or i believed it ?
 
the link proves the plans to blow it up have been there for years .
The question asked was who do we think was responsible which i gave my opinion so what bit is dishonest
You post implies the link supports your text.

and if it’s your opinion, you start by saying “In my opinion……”
 
no you thought wrong i implied nothing as usual you struggle and why should i have to say in my opinion when that was the point of the original question what was our opinion , You really do struggle with the basics
Lol, thick as mince as they say.
 
The Nordstream pipeline was sabotaged.

Who do you think did it???

Whether it was US or THEM basically boils down to that which you perceive.

So, who do you think did it???
From the OP stating the pipeline was sabotaged - when the article started by saying no sabotage was suspected...
GB/US plans been in place for years
An unsubstantiated statement that has nothing to do with the article given in the 'supporting' link...
Plenty of articles out there saying truss sent a message straight afterwards to blinken saying its done .Now she isnt the sharpest tool in the box which makes it sound believable and not the first time her communications have been hacked .
So one can make their own mind up .
Also russia has not tried to make much propaganda out of it so if they did do it to disrupt gas supplies far easier to just fake an explosion at the land based facilities which in time would be far easier to repair
Another 'opinion' not backed up with any evidence at all...
quite funny seeing how quick it takes toot and ploot to jump in with both feet

As you say...:rolleyes:
 
i see another one struggling with their own assumptions
 
Back
Top