Thanks for your input, homes.
As you will see from my post, if you read all of it, I am not concerned with 'who started what' albeit a I made passing reference to same.
If you have ever followed schizo's posts, and I suspect you perhaps haven't, you will have noticed a pattern of abuse to other posters.
Whilst you may not object to unnecessary abuse, I do, whether it is aimed at me or someone else, and I post those objections to schizo.
In the context of a forum, that is not improper use of the facility.
If you are at all interested, a significant number of his posts and threads have been removed by the mods.
Since they stand in judgement of what is or isn't acceptable on the forum, and have seen it as unwanted, I feel vindicated that my responses to his abuse and insults are well-founded and not simply petty points-scoring.
As for his signature, when I asked if he would have the same views if ever his immediate family (or himself) found themselves on benefits, his reply was 'Yes'.
Why do I have a problem believing that?