The laws an ass !

Sponsored Links
"He said he had converted to Christianity and was no longer safe in Iran".

Don't they all? :rolleyes:
 
They are already here. Being already here is nine-tenths of the law.
 
Sponsored Links
"He said he had converted to Christianity and was no longer safe in Iran".

Don't they all? :rolleyes:

In fairness, the Christian churches of European spent several hundred years forcing people to turn to Christianity, or killing them if they didn't, so it probably sounds a good bet as any.
 
And also, the "wrong sort" of Christianity.
 
SMH.

"Not proven that they intended to enter the UK illegally." Despite the journey through 10 countries with the UK at the very end of the line and them heading north towards the UK in a boat!

You could not make it up.

So don't land on a beach, turn the motor off and wait for a RNLI Uber to pick you up. The rest of the illegals will be texting their ilk on their free phones at this very moment.

We should be more like Hungary and lock those helping the illegals
BBC News - Hungary's Viktor Orban to defy EU over immigration law
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-59748173
 
Intolerant lot you are.

The law is the law and if wrong-doing cannot be proven or correct procedures are not followed, then people should not be incarcerated.

As for going though several countries, that is not a crime.

Stop being a bunch of xenophobes.
 
Clearly once out of the country where dangerous for them to stop, any ex asylum seeker will try to find a country which suits him, so if for example an English speaker he would want a country where they speak English, but once in first safe country he ceases to be an asylum seeker. And further moves he is an economic migrant.

Before we left EU there was some sort of agreement about sharing the load for asylum seekers, but that ended when we left.

There have been some silly rules which have been tried, like must speak English, even when the girl was from Patagonia, and spoke good Welsh, and was wanting to study in Wales.
 
An asylum seeker has to stop at first safe country, so unless the EU country they came from was not considered safe, then they are not asylum seekers.

please think about this, it’s not logical.

Your argument means that every single person leaving a country due to war or persecution has to stop in the neighbouring country.

It’s not the fault of the neighbouring country so why should they take responsibility?

What you are suggesting would destabilise the neighbouring country
 
We should be more like Hungary and lock those helping
Correct. More needs to be done to stop the profiteers of people smuggling and all the promises of milk and honey that don't actually exist. There will always be an influx of people to the UK whether they intended to come here or not and it's not down to the promise of £38 quid a week.:rolleyes:
 
SMH.

"Not proven that they intended to enter the UK illegally." Despite the journey through 10 countries with the UK at the very end of the line and them heading north towards the UK in a boat!

You could not make it up.

So don't land on a beach, turn the motor off and wait for a RNLI Uber to pick you up. The rest of the illegals will be texting their ilk on their free phones at this very moment.

We should be more like Hungary and lock those helping the illegals
BBC News - Hungary's Viktor Orban to defy EU over immigration law
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-59748173

Woody votes for the political party that flogs arms to places like Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia starts a proxy war in Yemen

the citizens of Yemen flee, some come to UK

Woody says: “I don’t want them here, fork all to do with me”
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top