B
Bodd
The march was about an arrest of a woman, nothing to do with child abuse, It was totally irrelevant.
Totally irelevent.
Your in Cuckoo land...
The thread is about Tommy Robinson... How is this irelevent
The march was about an arrest of a woman, nothing to do with child abuse, It was totally irrelevant.
How is a march about a Muslim women being arrested relevant to Tommy Robinson and his concern with Pakistani child abuse?Totally irelevent.
Your in Cuckoo land...
The thread is about Tommy Robinson... How is this irelevent
How is a march about a Muslim women being arrested relevant to Tommy Robinson and his concern with Pakistani child abuse?
Or are you looking for excuses for his Islamophobia?
Just to clarify: can you repeat that comment. I think you may have had difficulty with your punctuation and grammar, and I may have misunderstood your meaning.Stacey Jaclyn Dooley
She did know TR but I hardly
Believe that's she's part of his gang.
I am not disputing the video. I am saying it is irrelevant to this topic. It has nothing to do (nor did the march) with child abuse.Did you listen to the vile that come from their mouths??
Thus in your opinion is exceptable because a woman was arrested....
Why was she arrested ???
Just to clarify: can you repeat that comment. I think you may have had difficulty with your punctuation and grammar, and I may have misunderstood your meaning.
I saw it as,
"She did know TR but I hardly (knew him.)
(I) Believe that's she's part of his gang.
But you could have mistyped it and meant:
She did know TR. But I hardly believe that's she's part of his gang
I am not disputing the video. I am saying it is irrelevant to this topic. It has nothing to do (nor did the march) with child abuse.
Then it's highly probable that she will promote the same brand of Islamophobia as TR, i.e. the incitement of hatred against Muslims.
Look back, and you will see I have corrected it to account for the clarification in your post.Whats this about??
No, dunna be daft. I can guess what it was about, and I am not interested in TR's perverse brand of Islamophobia.Go back to the beginning... Its about the BBCs corruption. Did you even bother to watch it.
Sorry, just to clarify what I mean.Did I miss the Tommy Robinson supporters reunion?
BTW, I have to say, Stacey Dooley does not look like the typical passive reporter.
She appears to be more of an activist in that video.
No, dunna be daft. I can guess what it was about, and I am not interested in TR's perverse brand of Islamophobia.
Why would I want to watch a video posted by a racist?
I missed that whole evening of entertainment.
Sorry, just to clarify what I mean.
I didn't miss it in the way that I would have wanted to have seen it.
I missed it in the sense that I didn't know it was happening.
Referring to Jews as Semites is a bit like referring to Poles as Europeans.Which is obviously not correct. There are other nationalities within the Semites ethnicity.
But as it is a socially constructed concept, the name does not matter too much, as long as we all understand what it means.
But as it is a socially constructed concept, the name does not matter too much, as long as we all understand what it means.
I demonstrated quite clearly this morning that it is the only possible definition that could be applied.
But my explanation this morning was deleted within minutes. I was the only poster in that thread. There was no abuse, no insults.
The only plausible explanation is that it was deleted to avoid someone's embarrassing flawed and racist ideologies.
If you can use your influence to prevent it from being deleted again, I'll happily re-post it.