B
Bodd
So TR's concern with Pakistani abusers is misguided again?
Islam. The bad side of Islam
So TR's concern with Pakistani abusers is misguided again?
No. You are his devout follower, not me.
You asked earlier if you were on the list.
I did explain that you weren't, and that there were criteria that could allow you to be on the list.
As a devout follower of TR, you are quickly meeting such criteria.
Anyway lads i hear tommys asking for donations again, he wants another lavish holiday. Get ya wallets out!
Oh dear. The silliness, false accusations and downright immoral allegations are coming thick and fast now.Does this then make you a child abuser as you bat on the side of child abusers
Oh dear. The silliness, false accusations and downright immoral allegations are coming thick and fast now.
Really?Islam. The bad side of Islam
You imply that I am a child abuser because I criticise both Pakistani men and catholic leaders for abuse?
Taken from TR's website by any chance?
Six years ago, the world has moved on since, for most people.
You imply that I am a child abuser because I criticise both Pakistani men and catholic leaders for abuse?
So you post a video from YouTube.
What is your point.
The march was about an arrest of a woman, nothing to do with child abuse, It was totally irrelevant.The world has moved on since then....
You are off your rocker....
Stacey Jaclyn Dooley MBE (born 9 March 1987)[1] is an English television presenter, journalist, documentary filmmaker, media personality and author. Since 2009, she has made social-issue-themed television documentaries for BBC Three concerning child labour and women in developing countries.[2] She also won the sixteenth seriesof Strictly Come Dancing.[3]
She did know TR but I hardly
Believe that's she's part of his gang.
Of course the name matters. What else is there to communicate correctly.Which is obviously not correct. There are other nationalities within the Semites ethnicity.
But as it is a socially constructed concept, the name does not matter too much, as long as we all understand what it means.
As long as it is an accepted definition, then the word does not matter.Of course the name matters. What else is there to communicate correctly.
You can call them whatever you like, but you'll need to propagate your message for everyone to accept your definition of what it means, like entering the definition into a dictionary. Not just any old dictionary, but a world renown dictionary.Shall we call people who don't like Britain anti-hindu?