Tommy Robinson News - contempt of court

You're right of course but I think it's right to bring exposure to this issue, and keep doing it, because there are a lot of moderates who need to be saved from the hard-left propaganda machine. Let's not make it easy for them but staying silent, now's the time to stand up and make as many people aware of this as possible.

I agree, I think its awful how the hard laft propaganda machine has blamed immigration for all the problems in this country.

Im glad there is no right wing propaganda machine
 
Sponsored Links
exercising his right to an opinion.

He was arrested for Contempt of Court. Not for expressing an opinion.

As the judge said the first time, and as you are doubtless fully aware because you are obsessed with this violent criminal:

"This contempt hearing is not about free speech. This is not about freedom of the press. This is not about legitimate journalism; this is not about political correctness; this is not about whether one political viewpoint is right or another. It is about justice, and it is about ensuring that a trial can be carried out justly and fairly. It is about ensuring that a jury are not in any way inhibited from carrying out their important function. It is about being innocent until proven guilty. It is not about people prejudging a situation and going round to that court and publishing material, whether in print or online, referring to defendants as "Muslim paedophile rapists". A legitimate journalist would not be able to do that and under the strict liability rule there would be no defence to publication in those terms. It is pejorative language which prejudges the case, and it is language and reporting – if reporting indeed is what it is – that could have had the effect of substantially derailing the trial. As I have already indicated, because of what I knew was going on I had to take avoiding action to make sure that the integrity of this trial was preserved, that justice was preserved and that the trial could continue to completion without people being intimidated into reaching conclusions about it, or into being affected by "irresponsible and inaccurate reporting". If something of the nature of that which you put out on social media had been put into the mainstream press I would have been faced with applications from the defence advocates concerned, I have no doubt, to either say something specific to the jury, or worse, to abandon the trial and to start again. That is the kind of thing that actions such as these can and do have, and that is why you have been dealt with in the way in which you have and why I am dealing with this case with the seriousness which I am."
 
He's been arrested for Contempt of Court. Not for expressing an opinion.

As the judge said, and as you are doubtless fully aware because you are obsessed with this violent criminal:

"This contempt hearing is not about free speech. This is not about freedom of the press. This is not about legitimate journalism; this is not about political correctness; this is not about whether one political viewpoint is right or another. It is about justice, and it is about ensuring that a trial can be carried out justly and fairly. It is about ensuring that a jury are not in any way inhibited from carrying out their important function. It is about being innocent until proven guilty. It is not about people prejudging a situation and going round to that court and publishing material, whether in print or online, referring to defendants as "Muslim paedophile rapists". A legitimate journalist would not be able to do that and under the strict liability rule there would be no defence to publication in those terms. It is pejorative language which prejudges the case, and it is language and reporting – if reporting indeed is what it is – that could have had the effect of substantially derailing the trial. As I have already indicated, because of what I knew was going on I had to take avoiding action to make sure that the integrity of this trial was preserved, that justice was preserved and that the trial could continue to completion without people being intimidated into reaching conclusions about it, or into being affected by "irresponsible and inaccurate reporting". If something of the nature of that which you put out on social media had been put into the mainstream press I would have been faced with applications from the defence advocates concerned, I have no doubt, to either say something specific to the jury, or worse, to abandon the trial and to start again. That is the kind of thing that actions such as these can and do have, and that is why you have been dealt with in the way in which you have and why I am dealing with this case with the seriousness which I am."

I'm not going to spend one second of my time reading something you copied and pasted from a BBC or other MSM article. If you insist on pulling hairs just post the link, it's more pleasant to bypass versus a block of highlighted in bold text.
 
Do his "convictions from the past" entitle him to commit Contempt of Court. No.
Are they relevant? Do the two newspapers who committed the same offence deserve the same justice in the same court of law? Yes.
 
Sponsored Links
John is right with his post - I just want to know if he thinks the law should apply to all, or just Yax as he has a criminal record.
 
I agree, I think its awful how the hard laft propaganda machine has blamed immigration for all the problems in this country.

Im glad there is no right wing propaganda machine

Playing the jester at a time like this really is a point of contention for me personally and I'm sure people who genuinely care about their country and don't want to see it turned into a third world sh1t hole, which is rapidly occuring.
 
I'm all in favour of Newspaper editors being sent to prison when they commit Contempt of Court.

Pour encourager les autres.

I remember a couple of red-tops got away with a fine. Which means nothing to them
 
A nobody? Why because he has the guts to talk about what is happening to this country and wants change. It is always the same with you leftist liberals, either have the same political beliefs and views as me or you are a nazi.

If I was Tommy I would be looking to sue Sky news for slander. The 8 min segment that they shown was heavily edited. Making him give answers to totally different questions making him look bad. Trouble is people are so dumb and will believe anything the MSM tell them.

Spot on and welcome to the forum. Good to have someone who can talk sense. Too many LWRs on here.

And if you're always having to let pressure out of your combi, maybe the filling loop is passing or less likely mains water is passing from pinhole in plate heat exchanger to ch water. Bad idea to keep fresh water being added to boiler. Also not advised to release pressure from pressure release valve. It makes them leak. Best release from rad bleed or drain off valve. Boiler needs looking at ASAP.
 
Spot on and welcome to the forum. Good to have someone who can talk sense. Too many LWRs on here.

And if you're always having to let pressure out of your combi, maybe the filling loop is passing or less likely mains water is passing from pinhole in plate heat exchanger to ch water. Bad idea to keep fresh water being added to boiler. Also not advised to release pressure from pressure release valve. It makes them leak. Best release from rad bleed or drain off valve. Boiler needs looking at ASAP.

Cheers mate for the welcome. I have someone coming out next week. Hoping it will not cost an arm and a leg, winter on its way so I need a service anyhow.
 
The alleged contempt of court was for breaching reporting restrictions, yet they were not breached as everything he said was already in the public domain so that cannot be contempt of court.
Also the court did not follow their own rules on how to ensure that there were no reporting of the case so by not displaying the restrictions.

Try watching some of his videos, you will see how he is genuinely trying to bring to our attention the injustice that is being done to the people of the UK by some of the followers of Islam.
His support is far bigger than any derogatory comments you lot could make.
 
Why do you think he has to do that ? Nothing to do with the fear of attacks from extremist groups and wanting to protect his family ? Do you know who he is, his attitude and beliefs ? Have you bothered to watch the report or been following his unlawful imprisonment and torture ?
Yes,done all that,still don’t care for him or his beliefs.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top