Trump includes NHS in trade deal.

[Bodd]

It's up to you what you want to do with it, don't ask us.

Discusting

 

[SirGalahad]

I did provide some evidence but you wouldn't bother looking at it.

Where?

A quick search you posted 19 times on here and provided evidence of what? Nothing.

 

[SirGalahad]

Wind your neck in you arrogant cock. You might have a point to make that's fine but cut the constant disparaging remarks, you come across like a Rees Mogg on coke. We all have differing opinions and I dare say we are all equally intelligent and skilled in varying degrees.. its called diversity which alot of you love to uphold but act in quite the opposite on the GD threads. Sort it out all of you on here who somehow think anyone who doesn't have your 'more valued' opinion is thick. Grow up.

Just like you when I called you out trying to make out you knew something about software development / microservices. You can have your own opinion but not your own facts. Donr has posted crap and cannot back it up so I called him out.

It's not diversity - its knowing the facts and then there is bullshitting.

 

[donrkebab]

I did provide some evidence but you wouldn't bother looking at it.

Where?

A quick search you posted 19 times on here and provided evidence of what? Nothing.

The straw man has arrived, post No 9 - "Glad you mentioned that, the rip off starts closer to home with UK pharma like GSK fined billions in the USA for selling ineffective "drugs" over a 40 year period, the whistle blower was awarded $60,000,000 by the court. These same drugs were sold to the NHS, and guess what, no investigation and no fine, because the NHS with their socialist attitudes don't care about the cost."

None so blind as a straw man that doesn't want to see.

 

[noseall]

NHS with their socialist attitudes

Lol, nutter.

 

[SirGalahad]

The straw man has arrived, post No 9 - "Glad you mentioned that, the rip off starts closer to home with UK pharma like GSK fined billions in the USA for selling ineffective "drugs" over a 40 year period, the whistle blower was awarded $60,000,000 by the court. These same drugs were sold to the NHS, and guess what, no investigation and no fine, because the NHS with their socialist attitudes don't care about the cost."

None so blind as a straw man that doesn't want to see.

That is evidence of what you dumbo. Do you know how NICE works? Do you know whether they overcharged for those drugs in the UK? No'

GSk has been fined in the UK for other drugs issues.

So thats not evidence you Dumbo. Because they committed an offence in the US you just assumed they also did it in the UK.

Hahahaha That is not evidence that is you lying.

You stepper into this.

 

[SirGalahad]

Lol, nutter.

The dumbo has no idea, he straight up made something up as evidence, time to call these bs out.

 

[ellal]

It's up to you what you want to do with it, don't ask us.

'Tis true that I don't like pineapple...

What were you thinking about?

 

[SirGalahad]

Dumb donr tried to use an example why the private US healthcare system is open to abuse as a stick to beat the NHS. NICE decides what drs can prescribe on the NHS, drs dont have any incentive to prescribe more or different drugs - its a well regulated system that stops such abuses that you see regularly in the US.

Ohhhhh Dumb Donr

GSK was fined for the following

"The company encouraged sales reps in the US to mis-sell three drugs to doctors and lavished hospitality and kickbacks on those who agreed to write extra prescriptions, including trips to resorts in Bermuda, Jamaica and California."

 

[donrkebab]

Lol, nutter.

Aggressive pointless socialist comment

 

[donrkebab]

You stepper into this.

r u da godfada?

 

[ban-all-sheds]

That, and your subsequent comments are extremely unkind things to say.

As unkind as the attitude of those who expect utter nonsense to be believed?

When someone writes that NHS staff don't gather information about people presenting for medical care because of their socialist belief that money is not important, what does that say about that person's attitude to the intelligence and regard for facts and truth of those reading it?

 

[ban-all-sheds]

We all have differing opinions and I dare say we are all equally intelligent and skilled in varying degrees

But intelligent people do not have opinions which are based on and sustained by a refusal to accept truth and facts.

 

[SirGalahad]

But intelligent people do not have opinions which are based on and sustained by a refusal to accept truth and facts.

You can have differing opinions but not make up BS and lies and try pass them as facts. Donr et al were never reasoned into their position and so will not be reasoned out of it - they deserve to be exposed for their lies, because as eloquently said by the character played by Jared Haris in the brilliant miniseries CHernobyl - "every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth, sooner or later that debt is paid"

 

[donrkebab]

GSK was fined for the following

"The company encouraged sales reps in the US to mis-sell three drugs to doctors and lavished hospitality and kickbacks on those who agreed to write extra prescriptions, including trips to resorts in Bermuda, Jamaica and California."

Not smart enough to follow what I said, that's the wrong story, but that is what a straw man does.

And calm down you're getting over excited.