• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

We are being replaced

If doing something which it definitely had not been explicitly programmed to do is the definition then I was creating AI systems decades ago.
 
I think you may underestimate the importance of trying to help people understand the difference between computing and 'artificial intelligence', since a lot of people are (I think unnecessarily) seemingly being disturbed by what appears to be 'disinformation'.
Sorry John...bit daft that one (y):censored:
 
If doing something which it definitely had not been explicitly programmed to do is the definition then I was creating AI systems decades ago.
Can I ask you to define "explicitly" in your context please?
I am wondering how that can be unless you ask the computer to utilise one or more of a number of alternative subroutines after a random (or pseudo random) generated number to pick from? something like if rnd (a number between 0 and nearly 1) then multiply by 10 to get a number 0 to 10 = X, then goto subroutine X but that would mean 10 subroutines you have programmed and it kind of picks one of them to apply.
Hope you see what I mean (although I`ve not put it too well) .
My point being you have decided upon the subroutines and programmed them but then unsure which one the the ten to operate on.

My point being in essence, I dont see how it could do that if you have not preprogramed accordingly a number of appropriate preprogrammed alternatives.

I know you might think I am being thick but I can not see how it could work "out of program" so to speak
 
No need to apologise, but it does worry me a little that everyone seems to be getting panicked into fearing that everything done by computers is some sort of threat to the human race :)
That isnt really why I started the thread, I just thought it was a handy bit of software, AI? probably not.
 
If doing something which it definitely had not been explicitly programmed to do is the definition then I was creating AI systems decades ago.
Rearly? That's interesting. Could you perhaps give an example of the sort of thing your talking about?

However, I wonder whether, as ebee has suggested, we may be talking at cross-purposes as a result of different understandings of the meaning of "explicitly programmed"?
 
That isnt really why I started the thread, I just thought it was a handy bit of software, AI? probably not.
True "AI" software could be very useful (even if also 'potentially worrying') - but we first need to decide what "AI software" actually means, and whether we yet really have any.
 
Can I ask you to define "explicitly" in your context please? ... I am wondering how that can be unless you ask the computer to utilise one or more of a number of alternative subroutines after a random (or pseudo random) generated number to pick from? something like if rnd (a number between 0 and nearly 1) then multiply by 10 to get a number 0 to 10 = X, then goto subroutine X but that would mean 10 subroutines you have programmed and it kind of picks one of them to apply.
Quite so. That's a very common situation in software, but I definitely would not call it "AI". "Explicitly programmed" does not (in my book) preclude the possibility that what the computer actually does is determined by some random process - but, as you say, if that random process merely determines which of a number of programmed actions is undertaken, I would regard that as "explicitly programmed'.
I know you might think I am being thick but I can not see how it could work "out of program" so to speak
If you're being 'thick', then so am I :-)
 
That isnt really why I started the thread, I just thought it was a handy bit of software, AI? probably not.
I haven't tried to quote the route to get to that, My concern is the misinformation that prominant public facing AI is returning. I posted an example earlier from chatgpt:
1756934460598.png


Im sure everuone here will agree this is unacceptible but asking a similar question:
1756934944972.png

These results are typical of the misinformation in current results from that site so I'm not surprised people are concerned. I thought I'd try a different question:
1756935439112.png

Trying slightly different wording
1756935828098.png


However it's not all bad:
1756936176972.png
 
So I thought I'd ask a question without a real answer:
1756936590072.png

It's so wrong I thought I'd ask again:
1756936853104.png

At least it doesn't return a miraculous colour changing wire:
1756938008824.png


In all honesty I don't know if these drawings are harvested from actual website information including images or created by picking tidbits and mashing them together, also I know this is not what AI is all about but it is an obvious introduction for the general public to AI and we have already seen a couple of enquiries on the forum where DIYers have first clicked on the AI reply, then questioned the results on DIYnot.
 
Last edited:
Im sure everuone here will agree this is unacceptible but asking a similar question: ... These results are typical of the misinformation in current results from that site so I'm not surprised people are concerned. .....
So I thought I'd ask a question without a real answer: .... It's so wrong I thought I'd ask again:

In all honesty I don't know if these drawings are harvested from actual website information including images or created by picking tidbits and mashing them together, also I know this is not what AI is all about but it is an obvious introduction for the general public to AI and we have already seen a couple of enquiries on the forum where DIYers have first clicked on the AI reply, then questioned the results on DIYnot.
Yes, nearly all the answers you present are ridiculous and, given the context, many/most are potentially dangerous.

However, to be fair, and to put all this in perspective, I think it's fair to say that the great majority of answers provided by so-called "AI" tools are quite reasonable, many of them being totally correct.

However, as regards calling this "AI", I still very much question whether any "I" is involved, given that (as far as I am aware) what we are seeing is the result of a combination of 'internet trawling' and programmed behaviour.
 

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Back
Top