Woman jailed for sex with boy, 15

What should they have done with her?

  • Bang her up!

    Votes: 9 27.3%
  • Let her off!

    Votes: 1 3.0%
  • 15? Jammy git!

    Votes: 23 69.7%

  • Total voters
    33
  • Poll closed .
Passing sentence Judge Peter Jacobs told her: "If this was a 35-year-old man and a 15-year-old girl no one would raise an eyebrow if he was sent to prison."
Says it all - you can't have gender bias in legislation such that one group is afforded less protection or allowed more leeway than another.

Equality seems to be the card being played here. However, men and women aren't completely equal, are they? Especially at that age. 15 year old boys go around trying to get 'in' whilst 15 year old girls spend their time trying to keep the boys 'out' (well most do anyway!)

The court heard there was no victim impact statement as he had been a willing party.

So the judge's argument is flawed, I reckon he was just jealous that the woman was dishing it out to young men but probably wouldn't give his wrinkly old tadger a second look in a million years :LOL:

Slap on the wrists for the randy old bird maybe, but put away for 15 months? Some murderers don't get much more than that.

There was no mention of whether or not the lad was a virgin at the time. If not, should the punishment have still been as severe? (...to those of you that thought it just)
 
Sponsored Links
shytalkz said:
But the reason that that legislation exists is primarily due the fact that female bits are not necessarily fully formed prior to that age

As a matter of fact, the Age of Consent was introduced specifically to deal with a Victorian value, namely the value of selling your children as prostitutes! :evil: :evil: :evil: Before the law was introduced, it was common practice for the poor to sell their daughters to the rich as soon as they could. If you wanted to buy one, you went to a 'procurer', most of whom were female, and you got a girl in a drugged stupor for your money. It says a lot about Victorian men that they would happily pay to have sex with a comatose partner! :( :( :(

The new law was better than nothing but it was ill conceived in that it tackled the problem from the wrong end. Think about it. If there was an epidemic of car theft, would you start by cracking down on people who buy stolen cars! :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: Meanwhile ---

noseall said:
but there is more to sex than just intercourse.

How very true - and anyone under sixteen who wants to know what sex is all about should start with the many alternatives. :p :p :p A little effort invested in learning what real sex is will pay off handsomely many years later. Brewer's droop, chocolate drop, too tired, got a headache? No problem! ;) ;) ;)
 
Some countries do have age-of-consent laws based on that principle.[/quote]

Sounds like an amazing place to go on holiday
 
And yet you can have sex at 16 yrs of age but can't watch porn film until you're 18 yrs, stupid or what?
 
Sponsored Links
And yet you can have sex at 16 yrs of age but can't watch p**n film until you're 18 yrs, stupid or what?


How about the laws that allow a fellow to join the Military @16 or 17 BUT cannot drink until they are 21
 
The difference between a boy and a girl is that a boy cannot be forced to have sex with a woman, he would have to be aroused before he could perform the act so if he is aroused he must be enjoying it.
 
the difference between a boy and a man is a man can make decisions based on experience and wisdom.

if a man is coerced into doing something he shouldn't then he is a fool.

if a boy is coerced then he is vulnerable.
 
Yeh I bet that lad felt so 'foolish' after knobbing the teacher!
 
WTF is up with kids these days chance of an old bird (what was she 23) showing you the ropes fek as 15 year olds we would have given our right hands for that even if she was a pig .
Running to to the coppers god we would have been running to join the Q.
 
shytalkz said:
It says a lot about Victorian men that they would happily pay to have sex with a comatose partner! :( :( :(

... whereas these days, men buy inflatable equivalents.... or even a vag*na in a torch !!!! what's that all about? :eek:
 
the difference between a boy and a man is a man can make decisions based on experience and wisdom.

if a man is coerced into doing something he shouldn't then he is a fool.

if a boy is coerced then he is vulnerable.

Even if it's his birthday and he is a man in ten minutes time? Get a grip.
 
You never get a hard-on when you're not sexually aroused erm... tos.ser? Not even in a morning?
Even in the morning it isn't an unpleasent feeling. Are you saying that it is possible for a woman to rape a man?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top