why not just spend 90 mins on every asv and make sure they can't.
sorry but i think you are being naive regarding the new work times. if you think you have enough time to spend 90 mins on an asv and make all of your money on quality you are dreaming.
problems i envisage,
1. you get nothing for not completing something, this means yet again you have to rely on your 10 year out of date vanstock and luck to get your FTCR up.
2. gross performance on time alone could be hard to make, my initial calculations from what we were briefed shows its going to be tight if you dont get first time completions and you have to travel a lot, which i do. you will have to be extremely consistent if you are to have any chance and your quality and time will have to be good to make any money.
3. i move patches a lot, i may be asked to give completions to other engineers rather than travel back to complete myself without getting a fair amount back from them.
4. you now get around 1.5 hrs for an ASV and linked IB instead of the current .91 +1.17. unfair i think, im working on a cheat for this but it will be easily spotted and im not sure how it will go down with the management.
5. still no recognised way of getting an IB on top of an ASV without cheating.
6. the payments are poorly banded. i can see a lot engs being under the lower payment threshold. the upper payment is going to be a dream for the majority of engs. some will make it on and off but i can see it being difficult to attain regularly. it would have been fairer to keep the £5 per hour reward but fairness isnt the BG way is it?
7.with the removal of standby i have dropped around 4.5k, although im good enough to make some money i cant see me making that back in the new performance alone.