I have always hated this fooking rag and cannot stand how low this pile of shoit will go to get a story........ after the fire in London they have named / posted a picture of the taxi driver as if this guy was a terrorist... now not content with showing just one picture of him there is another two pictures .... one having a pint and another looks as though he is enjoying himself ..... trying to demonise him......... bar stewards... I have heard the guy who,s fridge was supposed to have started the fire is totally devastated........... well done daily fooking mail you pile of shoit..
Daily ragmail
- Thread starter Bodgeitandleggit
- Start date
Sponsored Links
Problem is, the RWR actually believe the tripe. Verbatim. Thick as schitt.
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 13,120
- Reaction score
- 3,081
- Country
http://metro.co.uk/2017/06/14/resid...-own-stuff-before-warning-neighbours-6709573/
This was in another thread
This was in another thread
noseall i have never bought the daily wail ,very rarely buy a news paper ,but if i do its the independent (may be ounce a week ?)
u always make ref to the daily wail as does johnd and wima wat sit
So as I see it u must be all looking at / reading the daily wail ,so u can gripe and complain about it
and i told u before we are not as thick as s***
Sponsored Links
D
Doggit
We read the papers that resonate with our thinking. I don't read the Mirror because I feel it's sooo blatantly left wing, and although the independant is as well, it does it in a more moderate way.
But it's interesting how people view things, because I read the Metro article about the Cab driver, and it seemed to question why he packed his suitcase first, and then knocked on his neghbours doors. We don't yet know when, or even if he called the Fire Brigade before he did that.
But it's interesting how people view things, because I read the Metro article about the Cab driver, and it seemed to question why he packed his suitcase first, and then knocked on his neghbours doors. We don't yet know when, or even if he called the Fire Brigade before he did that.
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
Is that the amount of skunk you smoke?
It explains a lot.
And I told you before, I am a Leprechaun from Skellig Michael.
Last edited:
Well considering it's a right wing newspaper and there are plenty of left wing papers, for the sake of balance, I believe it deserves a place. Keep in mind the left have become a cancer in this country, and throughout western nations at large. If these people aren't opposed it would be terrible for all of us.
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,439
- Reaction score
- 540
- Country
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_circulation
Don't let facts get in the way of a good rant my old boy.
The argument that one must read left and right wing rubbish in order to come to a balanced opinion is specious. It is better to form an opinion on the synthesis of facts.
The left are a cancer? What are the right wing nuts? Just as dangerous.
Far worse than cancer. At least with some cancers they can now be stopped.
Try stopping a left wing libertard.
D
Doggit
It would be a waste of time reading both types of paper, because neither sees the bigger picture, only what they are reporting on at the time. Any extreme is dangerous, because they work from anger and emotions, and ignore logic and the bigger picture. Most younsgsters vote Labour because they are idealistic, but many change to voting for the Conservatives later in life, because having gained experience, they can see the things aren't so cut a dried, nor so straighforward.
Most people couldn't even form a balanced opinion, simply because they aren't balanced in the first place. We are conditioned from birth to follow the path of our upbringing, and for most, that bilnds all that follows.
Labour bribes voters to get into power, and the Conservatives invariably let business's get too big for their boots - neither knows what they are doing, but as I always maintain, the Conservatives are the lesser of the two evils, because they take the country forward, whilst Labour drags everything backwards and downwards, because they don't want anyone to aspire to the heights that they've reached, and hypocricy will always destroy anything it touches. Most Labour politicians got a good education, but disliked Grammer schools because they were for the better off, so they destroyed them. Then because the education system fails children, they send their own kids to private school. They scream about selection for the well off, but forget that if they hadn't shut down the Grammar schools, then people wouldn't have to fight so hard to get into them, simply because there would be more of them with places for all.
Labour, the Liberals and the Greens, all want the voting age reduced to 16, because they know the votes will go to them; they aren't worried about doing what's right for the country, only what they need to do to get into power.
Most people couldn't even form a balanced opinion, simply because they aren't balanced in the first place. We are conditioned from birth to follow the path of our upbringing, and for most, that bilnds all that follows.
Labour bribes voters to get into power, and the Conservatives invariably let business's get too big for their boots - neither knows what they are doing, but as I always maintain, the Conservatives are the lesser of the two evils, because they take the country forward, whilst Labour drags everything backwards and downwards, because they don't want anyone to aspire to the heights that they've reached, and hypocricy will always destroy anything it touches. Most Labour politicians got a good education, but disliked Grammer schools because they were for the better off, so they destroyed them. Then because the education system fails children, they send their own kids to private school. They scream about selection for the well off, but forget that if they hadn't shut down the Grammar schools, then people wouldn't have to fight so hard to get into them, simply because there would be more of them with places for all.
Labour, the Liberals and the Greens, all want the voting age reduced to 16, because they know the votes will go to them; they aren't worried about doing what's right for the country, only what they need to do to get into power.
Very sensible, Doggit.
However, your statement that Grammar Schools were for the better off is not accurate.
However, your statement that Grammar Schools were for the better off is not accurate.
Sponsored Links
