It is possible to eliminate risk. Just do nothing
don't be daftSo it has legs now?
What valid reason do you have for shutting them down again given the staff pose a much greater risk than the visitors?
(Above notwithstanding, the actual stitching up and what - not at Stafford hospital was very good, if a little painful).....
No answer then. Just nonsense.
The scamdemic rolls on.
Over a million dead, but still a "scamdemic"?
Ok, answers:
No, it doesn't have legs, it floats in the air. Air doesn't move in straight lines.
When it comes to chronically ill people, often very week, elderly people, it is best to do everything to reduce risk. You can't stop the carers, but you can stop everybody else. Carers are also less likely to think ppe is a scam and doesn't work, so far less likely to spread it than people who believe conspiracy theories, and spread deadly fake news.
Over a million dead, but still a "scamdemic"?
How many people need to die before you admit you're wrong, Ryler? Go on, answer that
Well over 50 million people a year die. How many have died from covid and how many people have died from lockdown or the poverty or hardship caused by lockdown.
I don't know and nor do you.
World Health Organisation reckon that 300,000 - 650,000 die from flu every year.
where hospitals are overwhelmed and economies are wrecked anyway.
(abiding by strict precautions)
I'm glad you added (that)
When faced with a belligerent retired labourer demanding to be let in, how do you know he has been following all precautions prior to his visit, and will continue to do so until he has left the premises?
How do you know he is not one of the anti-scientific nutters who drone on about conspiracies, scamdemics, muzzles and face nappies?
How many care staff have infected residents?
How many visitors (abiding by strict precautions) have infected residents?