B
Bodd
What country's have taken their citizens back. I think I remember that Donald Trump once said it was wrong not to take them back.
Bye Shammina ...
- Thread starter ^woody^
- Start date
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
If a government or country claims the moral high ground, should it base it's conduct on what everyone else is doing?
Or should it decide its respect for international law, and abide by the decision in all cases?
It is simply not acceptable to pick and choose which international laws it wants to respect. If it does pick and choose, then it loses integrity.
The UK appears to be determined to pick and choose which international laws it wishes to respect, at its own volition and at its own convenience.
In a recent independent report, it is obvious that the power to deprive people of their citizenship refers to citizenship conferred on people by naturalization:
By the Immigration Act 2014 [IA 2014], Parliament conferred upon the Secretary of State the power under review: that is, a power to deprive a person of British citizenship resulting from naturalisation, in circumstances where the consequence of that order is to render the person stateless.1
https://assets.publishing.service.g...Anderson_QC_-_CITIZENSHIP_REMOVAL__print_.pdf
That power can also be applied where a British citizen has other citizenship options open to them. It was considered that SB had an option of Bangladeshi citizenship. But that option was firmly closed by Bangladesh.https://assets.publishing.service.g...Anderson_QC_-_CITIZENSHIP_REMOVAL__print_.pdf
Therefore a British citizen in her own right by birth has been made stateless, a clear breach of international and British law.
It is the combination of the circumstances that cause the breaching of the law.
1.4. So the uniqueness of the power under review arises:
(a) neither from the mere fact that deprivation of citizenship is exercisable on “conducive to the public good” grounds,
(b) nor from the mere fact that its exercise makes people stateless.
Rather, the distinctive nature of the power lies in its combination of those factors.(b) nor from the mere fact that its exercise makes people stateless.
Last edited:
Huge.
Millions per year just for one.
The security cost is vast
But those arms contracts with Saudi are worth billions.
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
Guilty by association is not the same as guilt by being an accessory.
You cannot be found guilty in UK simply for association with a guilty person.
You have to prove that they were an accessory to the crime.
B
Bodd
I think you could say that about a soldier who was part of the Nazi war machine. But can you really say that about a young girl who travelled across Europe to another continent to join an evil cult.
I like Uncle Fritz, a sound bloke from what I've heard.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
If they are adults and voluntarily part of that machine, and carry out the actions of that machine, then they are either guilty of a crime, or of being an accessory to a crime, if one has been committed.
Moreover, if one has risen to a high rank, and allegedly practised torture, in the name and on behalf of that machine, one cannot hardly be excused as just associating with criminals.
Additionally, if someone is suspected of committing, or being an accessory to, a crime, then they should be prosecuted.
That is what happened to prominent members of the Nazi 'machine'. If any of them spent time in prison for their conduct while being a member of that machine, then they have been charged with crime(s), found guilty and punished. They weren't punished for their political beliefs, however horrendous they might be.
They weren't intentionally turned into refugees.
The UK has intentionally created a refugee. We don't know how many more have been intentionally created by UK because the government refuse to release the details.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
Then prosecute her and, if found guilty, punish her.
But to deprive someone of their citizenship, and make them stateless is tantamount to state sponsored assassination without trial.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
Except he was a criminal, Apparently, according to transam he was imprisoned for his crimes. Unless he was the drunken one that fell out of the concentration camp guard tower.
nonsense
Sponsored Links
